Leona Mia

For me the slot machine is working fine.
I've version 1.2.226 under Win10 64bits 1809.

Leona Mia in student outfit, and my words go away 💖💖💖

@Vardoth
The bonus videos are completely different from the full shows, and not what some people want here.

Another new favorite Mina K because her dances go along with alot of game music and trance music i listen to :D of course she is great to look at as well 😍 still hasn't topped Irene but i like her for different reasons :)

In other words, what i've seen is when you win 10 credits, this mean the 2 credit for spin is not taken, and it add 8 credits. Then you win 10 credit.

I wanted to ask if it's safe to play the game now, as i experienced some unexpected behaviors last friday with the error server message.

Thx and keep up the good work

I like feet, but really, I dont think it matters that much whether models wear shoes or not.
In fact, I love a card in which the models keep their sexy stockings on all the time or stripy knee high socks!
What I think is more important than shoes or no shoes, is more oil, more water, more cream, more milk etc!

For me, the definition of " real or unreal " full nudity is meaningless, because female body seems much more noticeable than bare feet. After all, members have various preferences which result in purchasing behavior. Therefore, variety becomes a necessary strategy to fulfill most requirements.

It's really simple.... if you "need" the girls on your mobile, use your mobile browser and just watch their bonus videos on istripper.com. no storage problems, no app store censorship.

Maria Marino

Nice @Signara good for you to join us here.
Here is Maria Marino one boob out.

Well let me tell you who brought me here, first. And that was Melisa. But my frist card was Laetitia.

On this subject.............

I want the model to feel comfortable in her performance, so I am OK with either shoes on or off. Though I prefer shoes on in pole clips, again as long as the model is comfortable..........

I will buy four of them.

Of course I was referencing how it use to show in account history ...hence the change w/out notification part...FIN

@TheEmu, thats a good 'heads up' for Totem.
They don't seem to have factored in delayed purchase much at all.
Perhaps their margin loss on discounts will grow as more ppl discard notions of being a collector
and then it will become clearer.

All of your opinions matter here and I hope iStripper is paying their attention to this hot, trending and disruptive topic, take appropriate action based on all our amazing opinions and make girl watching, an interesting hobby to everyone in here.

Haha, I said that 'Girl watching' is a hobby, knock yourself out!

@TheEmu I agree Totem have access to the sales figures but with so many 'collectors' in the membership, I believe the figures would be offset/skewed.

Totem have access to much more detailed figures than just total sales. They could, for example, look at what new customers are buying or at what single diamond members are buying or at whatever easily identifiable sub-group they choose. In particular it would be trivial to filter out those that have nearly full collections or to look at what old cards are selling well (this last to eliminate any bias that some will have to buy new cards and hence to see what people are really selecting from the "menu"). I have no idea what they actually do, but there is plenty of scope for data mining.

My biggest gripe is with stockings. They should always come off in my opinion....both in the show and in some pictures within the photo set.

That I would agree with...

2 - Totem have access to a much larger data set about what people actually want to buy as opposed to what a few people say that they want. Totem quite naturally can be expected to give greater weight to the sales figures.

@TheEmu I agree Totem have access to the sales figures but with so many 'collectors' in the membership, I believe the figures would be offset/skewed.

We all have preferences ... I will buy all of a models cards if i really like her (regardless of her outfits), I will buy most cards where the model wears my favourite type of outfit (school skirts, tiny denim shorts, lacy lingerie)
I can see a models sales indicating her popularity but I am less convinced they indicate if the outfit is popular, even less if she keeps her shoes on.
There are members that love/***** swings and cages but i dont believe sales data would prove their value unless the entire card was swings or cages

@John555
I like to see bare feet but really dont care. I do not judge a performance on footwear.

@mulvaulva or wahatever not paging back.. the point being it use to be 10 creds was awarded not 8... end of story... it changed without notification

It's always been 10 credits, nothing has changed...
Net Gain or Loss = Credit won - cost to spin

the spin cost you 2 credits, you win 0 credits, your Net Gain or Loss is 0 - 2 = -2

the spin cost you 2 credits, you Win 10 credits, your Net Gain or Loss is 10-2 = 8

the spin cost you 1 credit, you win 1 credit, your Net Gain or Loss is 1-1 = 0

the spin cost you 1 credit, you won 1000 credits, your Net Gain or Loss in 1000 - 1 = 999

nothing has changed.

Edit
If you are referring to how it is displayed in your account History...
Yes, they are now doing the math and only showing the Net Gain, not the gross Win.

My first card was something sweet and juicy that you suck on... 👍😜

I like hairy, trimmed and shaved but I found the shaving scene to be very sexy.
I would love to see it repeated on other models in the future.

@rabbitman, what are you smoking ? ....Real full nudity outcomes have nothing to do with waders.

It is footwear

@Manue - Did you check back with the developers? Cause I still cannot hide this program via Short key on Mac!

@rabbitman, what are you smoking ? ....Real full nudity outcomes have nothing to do with waders.

@mulvaulva or wahatever not paging back.. the point being it use to be 10 creds was awarded not 8... end of story... it changed without notification

If one is picky in the sense of being a connoissuer, then surely the picky person must acknowledge the need for diversity and balance, and not feel the need to press ones own exquisite taste unto others.

A true connoissuer would never see it as "naked feet vs non naked feet", but instead accept the need for, naked feet, stilletos, pumps, boots, sandals, ***** flops, ballarina shoes, wellies, waders, crocs, clogs, tennis shoes, etc, and etc....

There are 2 ways how you can create such diversity: 1) By making a lot of different cards or 2) putting everything into a few cards. TOTEM has chosen option 1.

If you are to satisfy every kind shoe/no shoe fetisch in every card then you would also have to include every other kind of fetisch into every card, and then we not just talking about shoes, but also have to include, dresses, leggings, stocking, socks, head gear, different uniforms, skirts and so forth. A card would then be very expensive to produce and what we would pay for a card would then als be very high. If production costs were to remain at the same level as now, then, in stead of different cards every day, we would only be getting a single card each 2 months and it would cost 1000 credits. Noone wants that!

With 43,5% af the cards already being naked feet, I will say there is an overwhelming pressence of naked feet, especially considering there is 0% of cards featuring waders.

I don't like the idea that models must wear or not wear a certain thing. I think it is best if the model decides for herself and are not *****. When a model has the freedom to choose what she wears and what she does on camera then she is the most happy and that happiness is reflected in the cards.

@TallandSlimMan

Totem advertises FULL nudity. Perhaps they should look up the word "FULL" in the dictionary.

Totem knows perfectly the sense of this word, it's not fair to ask them to read the dictionary. Thank you.

@stefnev1 :thanks. But now I have to search through all the regular istripper cards for xxx. It would be nice to be able to sort by erocticism levels in the store.

@TheEmu, thank you for clarifying.. What disturbed me was your 60:40 reference used as an example appears to be what rabbitman was referring to as % of permanently shod cards shot. It was certainly not reflected in the poll outcome. Hypotheticals used as arguements always end up sounding a tad biased to me :-/

I have entered several comments on cards about this.

Totem advertises FULL nudity. Perhaps they should look up the word "FULL" in the dictionary.

I personally do not care about feet...it's fine with me if the model wears shoes, and as Wyldanimal has said this may even be preferable.

My biggest gripe is with stockings. They should always come off in my opinion....both in the show and in some pictures within the photo set.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

Well, according to the first comment on her other released card it may well be that she has only the one card that is totally unshaved..

@ciphoto : you're right, just fingers and briefly.

@EverthangForever - the polls are not irrelevant, nor as far as I can remember have I claimed that they are. What are irrelevant, because they are wrong, are the claims so often seen that a poll with a small number of participants indicates strong preference by the mass of mainly non-voting users one way or the other. A 60/40 split is statistically insignificant when 50 people vote, of little more significance when 100 or 200 vote but very significant if thousands vote.

@TheEmu , you said..
Totem have access to a much larger data set about what people actually want to buy as opposed to what a few people say that they want. Totem quite naturally can be expected to give greater weight to the sales figures.

Agreed, about the Sales figures...provided that the sales figures used are fully paid initial purchases.
Not purchases subsequently under concession duress ..ie: slot machine bundles and calendar etc.
I will often wait 60 days for permanently shod cards to come on sale before buying.

Btw, decrying every poll's relevance here as due to insufficient sample numbers or discussing an imaginary poll outcome of 40:60 the other way has little relevance imho.

In the facts, she doesn't remove all, and the remaining is quite sexy for my taste.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

I hope so too......we shall see....

While I prefer heels on, I don't mind them being off on table clips.

In my taste, the sooner shoes are removed the better - specially in table clips.
But it's just impossible to please everyone... so there's not a solution

Why do some shows say XXX in the description but don't have the red xx tag.Because that are normal iStripper cards just with one or two XXX clips, without sound.Newer iStripperXXX crads have longer XXX clips with penetration and (not always) toys and the XXX clips are with sound.Older iStripperXXX cards are almost only XXX clips.

Ah thanks. So the istripper cards can have a small amount of xxx. So correct me if I'm wrong I thought the xxx meant it had insertion/penetration. Maybe just fingers, and maybe just briefly is that correct? I couldn't find where i thought I read that before this morning.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

Further to my earlier comment about the boss buying the shoes.

Esp considering say, ~ Hilary's first and second takes here.

From various card comments left by OliverLoky and Ethan, it appears
that models are left to decide themselves whether to leave shoes on
or not for an entire shooting, and the statistics noted by @rabbitman
( 43,5% of all cards are RFN ) would also suggest Studio staff choose to
play no real part in balancing their models' decision re shoes.

Here then is a special request to Totem's costume department:

When discussing outfits with new models backstage..
could you please refrain from referring to the shoes offered
as having been personally bought by the owner ? It may unduely
influence whether models' leave the shoes on throughout their shootings.

Yeah i missed that i don't always read the description i go straight to the comments...that's my bad

Still though from my point of view this was bad timing for her to want to do that, i was loving the bush and it pushed me to get the first card.

a poll with 233 participants is Not statistically a good sample.

This is particularly true when the respondents are self-selected.

You should blame Maria.

Maria Marino was defiantly on my radar because of her nice full figure and even fuller bush. As i found out by comments she has a shaving clip that eliminates a big majority of a niche i love. The bushy category only has a handful of girls in it and now one less. So i gotta ask who thought this was a good idea?

a poll with 233 participants is Not statistically a good sample.
So there is no solid support to back up your statement.

This is true, and indeed you could take it further to indicate that the vast majority of iStripper users don't care enough either way to bother to vote.

@john555 - I understand completely - but you persist on asking for an increase in the number a particular type of clip that you personally like and keep on ignoring the facts that

1) A significant number of people like the exact opposite and you are asking them to forego their wants in favour of your own.

2) There are many other clip types that could just as legitimately be requested to have an increased representation but you dismiss these as being irrelevant when in fact they are "competitors" to the type of clip you want.

Nice share @interestingcard! Thanks.