Of course I was referencing how it use to show in account history ...hence the change w/out notification part...FIN

@TheEmu, thats a good 'heads up' for Totem.
They don't seem to have factored in delayed purchase much at all.
Perhaps their margin loss on discounts will grow as more ppl discard notions of being a collector
and then it will become clearer.

All of your opinions matter here and I hope iStripper is paying their attention to this hot, trending and disruptive topic, take appropriate action based on all our amazing opinions and make girl watching, an interesting hobby to everyone in here.

Haha, I said that 'Girl watching' is a hobby, knock yourself out!

@TheEmu I agree Totem have access to the sales figures but with so many 'collectors' in the membership, I believe the figures would be offset/skewed.

Totem have access to much more detailed figures than just total sales. They could, for example, look at what new customers are buying or at what single diamond members are buying or at whatever easily identifiable sub-group they choose. In particular it would be trivial to filter out those that have nearly full collections or to look at what old cards are selling well (this last to eliminate any bias that some will have to buy new cards and hence to see what people are really selecting from the "menu"). I have no idea what they actually do, but there is plenty of scope for data mining.

My biggest gripe is with stockings. They should always come off in my opinion....both in the show and in some pictures within the photo set.

That I would agree with...

2 - Totem have access to a much larger data set about what people actually want to buy as opposed to what a few people say that they want. Totem quite naturally can be expected to give greater weight to the sales figures.

@TheEmu I agree Totem have access to the sales figures but with so many 'collectors' in the membership, I believe the figures would be offset/skewed.

We all have preferences ... I will buy all of a models cards if i really like her (regardless of her outfits), I will buy most cards where the model wears my favourite type of outfit (school skirts, tiny denim shorts, lacy lingerie)
I can see a models sales indicating her popularity but I am less convinced they indicate if the outfit is popular, even less if she keeps her shoes on.
There are members that love/***** swings and cages but i dont believe sales data would prove their value unless the entire card was swings or cages

@John555
I like to see bare feet but really dont care. I do not judge a performance on footwear.

@mulvaulva or wahatever not paging back.. the point being it use to be 10 creds was awarded not 8... end of story... it changed without notification

It's always been 10 credits, nothing has changed...
Net Gain or Loss = Credit won - cost to spin

the spin cost you 2 credits, you win 0 credits, your Net Gain or Loss is 0 - 2 = -2

the spin cost you 2 credits, you Win 10 credits, your Net Gain or Loss is 10-2 = 8

the spin cost you 1 credit, you win 1 credit, your Net Gain or Loss is 1-1 = 0

the spin cost you 1 credit, you won 1000 credits, your Net Gain or Loss in 1000 - 1 = 999

nothing has changed.

Edit
If you are referring to how it is displayed in your account History...
Yes, they are now doing the math and only showing the Net Gain, not the gross Win.

My first card was something sweet and juicy that you suck on... 👍😜

I like hairy, trimmed and shaved but I found the shaving scene to be very sexy.
I would love to see it repeated on other models in the future.

@rabbitman, what are you smoking ? ....Real full nudity outcomes have nothing to do with waders.

It is footwear

@Manue - Did you check back with the developers? Cause I still cannot hide this program via Short key on Mac!

@rabbitman, what are you smoking ? ....Real full nudity outcomes have nothing to do with waders.

@mulvaulva or wahatever not paging back.. the point being it use to be 10 creds was awarded not 8... end of story... it changed without notification

If one is picky in the sense of being a connoissuer, then surely the picky person must acknowledge the need for diversity and balance, and not feel the need to press ones own exquisite taste unto others.

A true connoissuer would never see it as "naked feet vs non naked feet", but instead accept the need for, naked feet, stilletos, pumps, boots, sandals, ***** flops, ballarina shoes, wellies, waders, crocs, clogs, tennis shoes, etc, and etc....

There are 2 ways how you can create such diversity: 1) By making a lot of different cards or 2) putting everything into a few cards. TOTEM has chosen option 1.

If you are to satisfy every kind shoe/no shoe fetisch in every card then you would also have to include every other kind of fetisch into every card, and then we not just talking about shoes, but also have to include, dresses, leggings, stocking, socks, head gear, different uniforms, skirts and so forth. A card would then be very expensive to produce and what we would pay for a card would then als be very high. If production costs were to remain at the same level as now, then, in stead of different cards every day, we would only be getting a single card each 2 months and it would cost 1000 credits. Noone wants that!

With 43,5% af the cards already being naked feet, I will say there is an overwhelming pressence of naked feet, especially considering there is 0% of cards featuring waders.

I don't like the idea that models must wear or not wear a certain thing. I think it is best if the model decides for herself and are not *****. When a model has the freedom to choose what she wears and what she does on camera then she is the most happy and that happiness is reflected in the cards.

@TallandSlimMan

Totem advertises FULL nudity. Perhaps they should look up the word "FULL" in the dictionary.

Totem knows perfectly the sense of this word, it's not fair to ask them to read the dictionary. Thank you.

@stefnev1 :thanks. But now I have to search through all the regular istripper cards for xxx. It would be nice to be able to sort by erocticism levels in the store.

@TheEmu, thank you for clarifying.. What disturbed me was your 60:40 reference used as an example appears to be what rabbitman was referring to as % of permanently shod cards shot. It was certainly not reflected in the poll outcome. Hypotheticals used as arguements always end up sounding a tad biased to me :-/

I have entered several comments on cards about this.

Totem advertises FULL nudity. Perhaps they should look up the word "FULL" in the dictionary.

I personally do not care about feet...it's fine with me if the model wears shoes, and as Wyldanimal has said this may even be preferable.

My biggest gripe is with stockings. They should always come off in my opinion....both in the show and in some pictures within the photo set.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

Well, according to the first comment on her other released card it may well be that she has only the one card that is totally unshaved..

@ciphoto : you're right, just fingers and briefly.

@EverthangForever - the polls are not irrelevant, nor as far as I can remember have I claimed that they are. What are irrelevant, because they are wrong, are the claims so often seen that a poll with a small number of participants indicates strong preference by the mass of mainly non-voting users one way or the other. A 60/40 split is statistically insignificant when 50 people vote, of little more significance when 100 or 200 vote but very significant if thousands vote.

@TheEmu , you said..
Totem have access to a much larger data set about what people actually want to buy as opposed to what a few people say that they want. Totem quite naturally can be expected to give greater weight to the sales figures.

Agreed, about the Sales figures...provided that the sales figures used are fully paid initial purchases.
Not purchases subsequently under concession duress ..ie: slot machine bundles and calendar etc.
I will often wait 60 days for permanently shod cards to come on sale before buying.

Btw, decrying every poll's relevance here as due to insufficient sample numbers or discussing an imaginary poll outcome of 40:60 the other way has little relevance imho.

In the facts, she doesn't remove all, and the remaining is quite sexy for my taste.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

I hope so too......we shall see....

While I prefer heels on, I don't mind them being off on table clips.

In my taste, the sooner shoes are removed the better - specially in table clips.
But it's just impossible to please everyone... so there's not a solution

Why do some shows say XXX in the description but don't have the red xx tag.Because that are normal iStripper cards just with one or two XXX clips, without sound.Newer iStripperXXX crads have longer XXX clips with penetration and (not always) toys and the XXX clips are with sound.Older iStripperXXX cards are almost only XXX clips.

Ah thanks. So the istripper cards can have a small amount of xxx. So correct me if I'm wrong I thought the xxx meant it had insertion/penetration. Maybe just fingers, and maybe just briefly is that correct? I couldn't find where i thought I read that before this morning.

I love bushy models too... so I hope the "shave card" was the last one of her 6 to be shooted... 😉

Further to my earlier comment about the boss buying the shoes.

Esp considering say, ~ Hilary's first and second takes here.

From various card comments left by OliverLoky and Ethan, it appears
that models are left to decide themselves whether to leave shoes on
or not for an entire shooting, and the statistics noted by @rabbitman
( 43,5% of all cards are RFN ) would also suggest Studio staff choose to
play no real part in balancing their models' decision re shoes.

Here then is a special request to Totem's costume department:

When discussing outfits with new models backstage..
could you please refrain from referring to the shoes offered
as having been personally bought by the owner ? It may unduely
influence whether models' leave the shoes on throughout their shootings.

Yeah i missed that i don't always read the description i go straight to the comments...that's my bad

Still though from my point of view this was bad timing for her to want to do that, i was loving the bush and it pushed me to get the first card.

a poll with 233 participants is Not statistically a good sample.

This is particularly true when the respondents are self-selected.

You should blame Maria.

Maria Marino was defiantly on my radar because of her nice full figure and even fuller bush. As i found out by comments she has a shaving clip that eliminates a big majority of a niche i love. The bushy category only has a handful of girls in it and now one less. So i gotta ask who thought this was a good idea?

a poll with 233 participants is Not statistically a good sample.
So there is no solid support to back up your statement.

This is true, and indeed you could take it further to indicate that the vast majority of iStripper users don't care enough either way to bother to vote.

@john555 - I understand completely - but you persist on asking for an increase in the number a particular type of clip that you personally like and keep on ignoring the facts that

1) A significant number of people like the exact opposite and you are asking them to forego their wants in favour of your own.

2) There are many other clip types that could just as legitimately be requested to have an increased representation but you dismiss these as being irrelevant when in fact they are "competitors" to the type of clip you want.

Nice share @interestingcard! Thanks.

It is from the slot machine. You need to turn it off separately.

There is a speaker icon in the lower right corner of the slot machine. Click on it to disable the sound of the slot machine. The wolf calls should then be gone.

@DuziKolo
@Wyldanimal

I've also had some slots without a show or golden egg in recent games.
There was no message because there were shows in the last game.

I checked the Girls Store and found that there is no show in the Exxxx series older than 45 days.

And I would like every model to eat carrot for at least 3 clips in every card.
@rabbitman123 It's a great idea, but let's put it to vote against bare foot in 3 clips and see who wins.

Game on!

Voting results (No. of votes)

Carrots: 1 😆😆
Bare foot: 1000@john555

Sigh

You are missing my point.
My point is: You can't satisfy everybody always.

You suggestion is: "3 clips with no shoes in every card" If you ask 10000 people what they would like to see in every card, you are likely to get 10000 different suggestions. There is no way you will be able to incorperate something like that into every card.

You can't put it up as "this against this" It is a stupid way of deciding things as you would then get no balance.

There is currently 1797 bare feet cards out of 4131 cards. 43,5% of all cards. That seems like a damn fine balance.

You yourself has been a member here since december 2016. You have 58 cards, however there has been released 522 barefeet cards during the time you have been a member here. A total of 828 cards has been since 2017. This means nearly 2 out of 3 cards during the time of your membership has been barefeeted. Yet you yourself have only bought 58 cards during your time. How about buying the cards you are missing before you start ***** about not enough cards with your fetisch?

@rabbitman123 I did get the point you were trying to make the first time. You were trying to mock the topic indirectly, that is why I had to comment that way and also made it look funny so that no one is offended.

Look, I am picky when it comes to cards, I have many requirements and bare feet is one of them, I create topics get other's opinion prior to making a purchase, in that way when I buy a card I wanna be sure that I will be 100% satisfied and I rarely find a card worthy of all my considerations.

Also, you pls. do note that there is no one ***** anything here in this topic. Everyone's opinions are varied and if you consider them to be complaints then sort that thing first in your mind before commenting.

At least I am confident now to say majority of the members prefer clips with bare feet.

a poll with 233 participants is Not statistically a good sample.
So there is no solid support to back up your statement.

Like I said,
it depends on the Feet.

For me, Some feet are real turn offs. While others aren't

If I had to make a Black or White Choice,
Keep shoes on, or Take Shoes off?

My Choice would be Keep shoes on.

And I would like every model to eat carrot for at least 3 clips in every card.
@rabbitman123 It's a great idea, but let's put it to vote against bare foot in 3 clips and see who wins.

Game on!

Voting results (No. of votes)

Carrots: 1 😆😆
Bare foot: 1000

@john555

Sigh

You are missing my point.
My point is: You can't satisfy everybody always.

You suggestion is: "3 clips with no shoes in every card" If you ask 10000 people what they would like to see in every card, you are likely to get 10000 different suggestions. There is no way you will be able to incorperate something like that into every card.

You can't put it up as "this against this" It is a stupid way of deciding things as you would then get no balance.

There is currently 1797 bare feet cards out of 4131 cards. 43,5% of all cards. That seems like a damn fine balance.

You yourself has been a member here since december 2016. You have 58 cards, however there has been released 522 barefeet cards during the time you have been a member here. A total of 828 cards has been since 2017. This means nearly 2 out of 3 cards during the time of your membership has been barefeeted. Yet you yourself have only bought 58 cards during your time. How about buying the cards you are missing before you start ***** about not enough cards with your fetisch?

@john555
Over past years most folks have proven reasonable in their poll outcomes here inspite of @TheEmu 's
apparent reluctance with this issue to consider those outcomes to have any validity.
I agree with you, that the high percentage of permanently shod cards produced here remains bewildering,
however IMHO, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. The poll is and was already done and dusted.
Its Totem's business to press on with what they think sells best inspite of our individual voices. http://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/31290/1?post=481558&soft_navigate=ExternDefaultBrowser

At least I am confident now to say majority of the members prefer clips with bare feet.

This is wrong, These are all equally valid alternatives to "bare feet" being made part of every card. It would quite obviously be impractical to always have say 3 bare feet clps + 3 naked except for shoes + 3 stocking legs + 3 bare legs + 3 commando style + 3 with bra + 3 bra less etc. etc. etc. Your preference for bare legs in no way makes it more important than anyone elses preference and the existance of these alternatives go a long way to explaining why the automatic inclusion of 3 bare feet clips is not likely to happen.

@TheEmu This makes me wonder if you really understood the meaning of this topic. Please read the title of the topic once again and have your comments inclined towards it. Otherwise it would pitch to a different subject. When I say bare feet I meant RFN - Really Fully Naked. At least in iStripper's terms that is what 'bare feet' means.

Buddy, there aren't any alternatives to RFN clips. I wish I edited and replaced 'bare foot ' from all my messages to RFN clips.

When the title says "I would like to see every model strip fully naked in iStripper" requesting to have "high heels , cage , cream , glass , swing , whip , anal , dildo , vibrator, etc." makes no sense and are for different topic.

@EverthangForever - I do not consider that the votes have no validity, but there are two things that do need to be taken into consideration

1 - The polls here often have rather few people voting. If, for example only 100 people vote and the split is 60/40 then these numbers are such that this is statistically consistant a second poll on the same subject with 100 different people voting 40/60.

2 - Totem have access to a much larger data set about what people actually want to buy as opposed to what a few people say that they want. Totem quite naturally can be expected to give greater weight to the sales figures.

@John555 - you said

However cool your request to have "high heels , cage , cream , glass , swing , whip , anal , dildo , vibrator, etc." may seem, they are at the moment way off the topic. But I appreciate your thoughts. I would suggest you to create a new topic for the same.

This is wrong, These are all equally valid alternatives to "bare feet" being made part of every card. It would quite obviously be impractical to always have say 3 bare feet clps + 3 naked except for shoes + 3 stocking legs + 3 bare legs + 3 commando style + 3 with bra + 3 bra less etc. etc. etc. Your preference for bare legs in no way makes it more important than anyone elses preference and the existance of these alternatives go a long way to explaining why the automatic inclusion of 3 bare feet clips is not likely to happen.

For some crazy reason the istripper app is making a repetitive wolf call, which is driving me nuts. All audio is switched off. How do I get rid of this stupid thing.

@supermouse Hi, please check our new game out : VR Paradise on Steam https://steamcommunity.com/app/896890

I like that game, I didn't realise it was from yourselves.

Point to note:

1) If cards have bare feet clips - Likers are happy and ***** have an option to turn off so everybody is happy.
2) If cards do not have bare feet clips - Likers are happy and ***** do not have any option to deal with so not everybody is happy

Wrong. ( 1st re-read what you wrote you got the 2nd one backwards but I know what you meant )

here is an Important point..
If the bare foot clips are also the only level 4 or level 5 clips, then the members who Do not like bare feet, Have to turn off or remove the Only level 4 or level 5 clips.

This would make many Members, including myself very unhappy..

Variety is Best...

I am not a collector so it is not a hobby for me. Personally I think it would be weird to consider it a hobby.

not so weird to call it a hobby, and you need not be a collector for it to become and Obsession or become ***** to it...

For me, It fits the definition of a hobby..

"an activity done regularly in one's leisure time for pleasure."

And I meant my post in Jest...
That once you get hooked, you can't stop at just one...

@DuziKolo

perhaps you Ignored this...

If you Don't have enough Card to win, Then you Play the Slots Only to try and win Credits.

Your attempt at ***** Sarcasm is not Welcomed.