thank you for these scenes @sh42n81

Small problem with the sh4_Carnival3 scene

I wonder if there would not be a way either to lower the image to the cut of the legs or to put an object in front of the ***** of the feet.

The girl behind the counter finds it funny that the girls no longer have feet. Bad girl. 😄



Merci pour ces scènes @sh42n81

Petit problème avec la scène sh4_Carnival3

Je me demande s'il n'y aurait pas moyen soit de descendre l'image jusqu'à la coupure des jambes ou de mettre un objet devant l'***** des pieds.

La fille derrière le comptoir trouve très drôle le fait que les filles n'ont plus de pieds. Mauvaise fille. 😄

It's hard to read the OP due to poor formating but in general I agree that the recent crop of shows - the girls filmed during COVID - was not that interesting for me. I don't mind the lack of nudity, I just don't find them too attractive. Celia and Audalove are fun for me, but that's about it.

@sh42n81 if I may D/L "Carnival 3" this looks really nice, mainely cause it's a summer time thing & down to the
ground

@gkar45 Thank you for the feedback!

Thanks for the help @TheEmu

I managed to get the shadows to follow with the girls. :)

Thank you for the clarification regarding the reverse lettering @titiii.

Indeed it would have been quite weird to see the girl appear out of nowhere in the center of the screen in an in / out scene.


Merci pour l'aide @TheEmu

J'ai réussis à faire suivre les ombres avec les filles. :)

Merci pour la précision concernant le lettrage inversé @titiii.

En effet cela aurait fait assez ***** de voir la fille apparaître de nulle part dans le centre de l'écran dans une scene in/out.

That works well. 😊

How do you go about inverting the whole scene from the code I showed you?

Thanks @TheEmu.

Most of ALL in my Opionion on behalf or in regard of the OUTFITS and as well as in TOTAL

What are good outfits is very subjective: what the one likes, the other doesn't like, but outfits are very important to me in the buy/not buy decision.
A great outfit of last Friday was for me Takha in the ***** outfit, which corresponded with her girlish face and supple way of moving.
When I buy a show the following decision process is taken:
1. Do I like the model
2. Do I like the outfit (preference for normal clothing)
3. e-card or f-card (preference for e-cards)
4. Is the model a reasonable dancer
When buying a show it's always a kind of compromise. The last years I have become more selective with buying shows, which feels good. A week without buying a new edited show: no problem.

I didn't participate in the August pre-order. Still one point of critisism: too many shows of the same models, so lack of variation. There were three shows of Takha!
In the Advent of 2019 there were far more different models; maybe one or two shows of the same model.

"Carnival 3"

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1JWwnzKdb3rmQ0UWtiWOCvstMggNgfeXn

Show quality comes and goes and judgements are very subjective. We need to give Totem a break...the Ukrainian border is closed, their strategy of using girls from there is unworkable and they're using whatever performers they can find in France. I have no idea what the make-up and costume people do about social distancing, but it can't be easy.

If everybody else agrees with you, it'll show in the sales figures and they'll get back to the standards we're used to as soon as circumstances allow. Personally, I reckon we've seen a few very good shows in recent weeks and I certainly don't regard August as a disaster. More like a breath of fresh air....

Let me first of all say , that I am still sure , that I am convinced that I-Stripper - still is the very best Erotic Show Side - respecitively Program in the Internet - most of all in total and it is " mucho sympatía " ! BUT - I think - especially after the last (warm to hot) Summer Months of August in my Opinion - and MOST OF ALL during the last 2 weeks of Shows (second half of August) I think I witnessed a more than less stronger/strong downfall on behalf of the Shows Quality in total - with some exceptions - Kitana Lure, Audalove, Celia Clay and Stella.... On the other Hand - however - I also know that I-Stripper and many others still have to deal with the Impact Desaster of the "Neverending Story" of CORONA/Covit-19 and so far - after my - Impression I-Stripper dealed with this Problem VERY well and GOOD in total ! - Nonetheless I think that the Show Quality did fall downward during the last Month of August - and especially during the last 2 weeks. - NOT so much on Behalf of the Perfomance within the Shows and maybe also not sooo much on behalf of the Models - Girls and Women - Most of ALL in my Opionion on behalf or in regard of the OUTFITS and as well as in TOTAL - most of all compared to the recent Years 2019, 2018 and 2017 - I think that has to be stopped and turned again towards the better again - by some ***** (small) new Show Performance Rules and partly better feminine and/or Erotic Outfits - again. What I mean by that I will explain somewhere around the Middle to the End of September - in a - perhaps - not too long " Show Improvement Suggestion Comment " by me . So, the Conclusion is - I do have the Impression that I-Stripper Shows had especially during August ( and especially during the last 2 weeks) reached a new Low Point - after some Years with a lot of ***** and good Improvements and has to get better again (compared to this August - most of all.). Although I need to say that I do have the "unspecific" FEELING that this is ALREADY in the Making - BUT - perhaps - also not - I don't know yet - so , let's also wait and see what the entire SEPTEMBER 2020 will bring in total - will it be better than this August - most of all on behalf of Outfits in total or not ??! - I don't know yet - but I hope stongly for the better again - also due to some very fine - real good looking erotic new Models who still had been in the Studios recently. 💗😊👍

@TheLanger
suggested this too a few months ago :

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44704/1?post=662767

Let's hope this improves someday... 😉

they should use the graphics and dvelop game mode. they can have stripper fighter, like mortal kombat but strippers

@Alkasyn - the 16K is the number of members who have ever made at least one post to the forum - a lot of those have made only one and many last posted quite a few years ago. How it relates to active members is anyone's guess (other than it being an upper limit to active posters). I agree with you that the active membership, depending on how you define that, may well be of this order of magnitude - I think rather higher but not 10 times higher and I have no data to support that conjecture. I think @Rex once gave a rough figure for the active membership but I can't remember whether that was in the tens or hundreds of thousands though I think he said it was not in the millions.

@ComteDracula - this is in response to your question in the Scene Sharing thread

clipSprite {
pos: -600, 195 // Change this to be pos: -800, 195
standingHeight: 525
source: ClipB
scale: 1, -0.25, 1
opacity: 0.5
color: 0.0, 0.0, 0.0
material: true
}

clipSprite {
pos: -800, 200 // If this is where you want the girl then you want the shadow to be close to it
standingHeight: 525
scale: 1, 1, 1
source: Clip
material: true
}

With regard to the direction of the girls shadows and those in the background or foreground elements of the scene, You can use a small rotation to change its direction slightly but if you rotate by more than a few degrees the shadow will detach itself from the dancer's feet. There is little that can be done about that without using a more complex shader to generate the shadow - you need to distort the clip containing the shadow from a rectangle to a parallelogram by applying a shear transform or even better by applying a combination of a shear and an taper. This can be combined with the blurring that is already being used for the shadow and even with a gradient applied to the colour and opacity of the shadow. But though this is relatively simple shader work it is by no means trivial. I have such a shader but it is a real ***** to use. Someday I may try to make it more user friendly, but until then i do not recommend that you try to use it unless you are really comfortable with using or writing shaders.

With regard to the direction of writing on the girls clothes, you could reverse the whole scene then the girls could enter from side and still have the writing the right way round.

We never had any reliable numbers and we guesstimated. To be honest, I think the figure of 16k active users (really buying cards) is closer to the turth than 2 or even 20 million.

@ComteDracula

I jave replied in the scenes discussion thread.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/27449/100?post=678149

@TheEmu
Thx for the nodes tip, very useful indeed for the shadows.

@ComteDracula
In your scene the girl (Clip) is : -800, 200
and the shadow (ClipB) is : -600, 195
--> The shadow x axis should be -800 as well, rather than -600

Letters inversion : I chose to let the girl enter from the left rather than let her
magically appears somewhere on the scene, so the mirroring is inevitable in this case (but letters on clothes are pretty rare).

@The Emu

I'm trying to change the code, according to your example, but it doesn't work.

Could you change it, so that I can better compare the two pages.

Moreover in this example the shadow is on the right, whereas it should be on the left to respect the position of the sun.

I also noticed that there was an inversion of the letters on the girls' sweater.

I wonder if the inversion of the images was not to allow entry from left to right of the screen in "in / out" scenes?

Thank you.


clip {
id: Clip
deny: top, table, glass, cage, pole, accessories
}

framebuffer {
id: ClipB
source: Clip
shader: blur_more.fsh
}

//-------------------------------------------------

texture {
id: background
source: beach2.jpg
}

texture {
id: mask
source: beach2_m.png
}

texture {
id: shad
source: beach2_s.png
}

//-------------------------------------------------

camera {
type: 2D
pos: 978, 550
size: 1956, 1100

//-------------------------------------------------

sprite {
size: 2152, 1435
source: background
blend: true
}

clipSprite {
pos: -600, 195
standingHeight: 525
source: ClipB
scale: 1, -0.25, 1
opacity: 0.5
color: 0.0, 0.0, 0.0
material: true
}

clipSprite {
pos: -800, 200
standingHeight: 525
scale: 1, 1, 1
source: Clip
material: true
}

sprite {
size: 2152, 1435
source: mask
blend: true
}

//-------------------------------------------------

clipNameSprite {
scale: 0.9, 0.9
pos: 600, 400
source: Clip
}

light {
ambient: 0.7, 0.7, 0.7
}
}

I have moved the girls, but the shadows don't follow the movement of the girls.

how do you move the girls' shadows in the code?

There should be separate clipSprites for the girls and their shadows. Just change the pos: X value of that for the shadow to match that of the girl.

An alternative method that can be used when creating the scene is to nest the clipSprites for a girl and her shadow in simple a Node, something like the following (where I have added leading .. characters to preserve indentation, they should not be there in a .scn file)

node {
..
.. pos: 0, 300, 0 // Change this to move both the girl and her shadow
..
.. clipSprite { // Shadow
.. .. scale: -1, -1, 1
.. .. standingHeight: 770
.. .. color: 0.0, 0.0, 0.0
.. .. opacity: 0.25
.. .. source: Clip1
.. }
..
.. clipSprite {
.. .. scale: -1, 1, 1
.. .. standingHeight: 770
.. .. source: Clip1
.. }

Note, there are no pos: clauses in the clipSprites themselves so they default to Pos : 0, 0, 0 - of you use one then then it will specify an offset from the pos: given in the containing node - this can be useful for reflections if you want them to be slightly lower than they would otherwise be.

The use of a node like this can also be used to tie a clipNameSprite to a clip - but if you do then it might get obscured by any foreground items in the scene so it is not always practical. You can even nest a clipNameSprite inside a clipSprite, that way not only will they move together if you change the pos: for the clipSprite but you can omit the Source: for the clipNameSprite as it will use the one from the enclosing clipSprite - this ensures that you don't accidently display the wrong name (as I have all too often done).

I will point out that "downloaded" is not the same as "installed" - though I doubt that there would be that much difference so my 2 million figure is very likely just due to poorly remembering the 20 million. As an aside I remember downloading and installing 3 times with different accounts in quick succession (and never using the first two) before I settled on this account, we also see people regularly saying that they have lost their collection due to accidently creating a new account when reinstalling - but that will, I hope, only be a small proportion of the accounts.

Nor do we know how many have only looked at previews or have bought only a very small number cards before deciding that "this is not for me".

What percentage of them now have a completely full card collection? (+/- 100 cards)
Is it all of the Hall of Fame?

From the Hall Of Fame we can only reliably see the number of those with an absolutely full collection or are just a few cards short of it (last month up to 19 cards short). It only shows 250 entries so those lacking 100 cards would be way off the bottom of the list. But we do not know what the distribution is - there may be a sharp peak close to the 100% full collection or there may be no peak there at all - we ordinary users have no way of knowing. (actually we know that there is a very sharp peak otherwise we would only be able to see those that are one or two cards short of a full collection, I was thinking of a possible sharp peak that might be a few hundred cards wide underneath this very sharp one)

@titiii,

J'ai fait ce changement

Changement de pos: dans le code de -600, 200 à --800, 200 pour déplacer la fille plus à gauche dans la scène Table 1.

Et de -400, 200 à -800, 200 pour la fille à gauche (Clip), de -100, 200 à 300, 200 pour le fille du centre (Clip2) , et de 200, 200 à 600, 200 pour la fille à droite (Clip3), pour les déplacer plus à droite dans la scène Table 2.

J'ai déplacé les filles, mais les ombres ne suivent pas le déplacement des filles.

comment déplace t-on les ombres des filles dans le code ?

Merci pour le déplacement du nom sur le côté à gauche de la fille, dans la scène _isle.


@titiii,

I made this change

Change of pos: in the code from -600, 200 to --800, 200 to move the girl further to the left in the scene Table 1.

And from -400, 200 to -800, 200 for the girl on the left (Clip), from -100, 200 to 300, 200 for the girl in the center (Clip2), and from 200, 200 to 600, 200 for the girl to the right (Clip3), to move them further to the right in the Table 2 scene.

I have moved the girls, but the shadows don't follow the movement of the girls.

how do you move the girls' shadows in the code?

Thank you for moving the name to the left side of the girl, in the _isle scene.

When a New Users Signs up they are given a default Account number such as i21345678
The Numeric portion is the current count of how many have previously downloaded the software.

edit: It should say
downloaded and Installed the Software..
not sure why the Installed part didn't get posted.
An Account is only created when a member Installs the Software.

I just added a new Test account

i27778295
member number
27,778,295

@titii

By the way, there is an easy way to take a screenshot of your scene : press the "S" key, that save a jpg file in scene directory.

Oh, that's convenient! Nice to know.

Just to be sure, if i restrict the position with "table", it automatically includes fronttable and behindtable, right ?

Correct.

@ComteDracula
Ok, i understand. I checked the name location only with a fresh scene start, not with a new girl at maximum zoom...
This is updated now !

By the way, there is an easy way to take a screenshot of your scene : press the "S" key, that save a jpg file in scene directory.

Scenes titiii_beach2020_table and table2 : this is already scenes with standing girls only (with some girls it doesn't work perfectly), and the location of the girls suits me.
(You can change my scenes if you want, just increase the x coordinate to push the girls to the right : pos: x, 200)

Just to be sure, if i restrict the position with "table", it automatically includes fronttable and behindtable, right ?

Autre exemple, attention, il n'y aura bientôt plus personne.
C'est une scène cache-cache. (moi, je trouve amusant)
Ou alors sélectionner uniquement les clips "debout" ? Peut-être. Mais là ce n'est pas mon domaine.

Elle est bien bonne @Philours 😄

Ah, oui , mais non : je la connais : c'est une timide 😆

@titiii

Un exemple di fille que l'on voit mal et qui est acccroupie derrière la table. De là l'idée de les faire danser sur les côtés de la table.

Pas de soucis @ComteDracula, je suis qqu'un de reconnaissant 😉

J'ai testé la scène et je comprend votre problème.

Au début de la scène, effectivement pas de soucis.

Après le zoom, plus que le titre du show, mais pas celui de la fille.

J'ai finalement réussis. Merci @Philours.

Voici deux captures d'écran, avec deux filles différentes, vu qu'elles apparaîssent de façon aléatoire.

Désolé pour vous, c'est vrai que ce n'est pas simple,
C'est ce qui m'arrive parfois, je ne pense pas faire quelque chose de spécial.
Il faut vraiment que les 3 touches soient enfoncées au même moment, cela se joue a pas grand-chose.
D'où le fait d'être assez rapide, même très rapide.
Encore un essai peut-être ?

Merci @Philours, mais pour moi ça ne fonctionne pas, je me retrouve avec l'image de la page plein écran avec les différentes scènes, et la scène disparaît aussitôt que je touche à la touche windows.

J'ai essayé les trois touches ensemble, mais le système ne me donne même pas le choix de choisir la forme de ma capture d'écran.

Il y a probablement quelquechose que je ne fais pas de correct.

Windows, Maj et s en même temps, cher @ComteDracula
Ca fonctionne mais il faut être rapide et bien synchroniser ses 3 doigts 😀😀

@ComteDracula
Thank you for your feedback.
For me, on "titiii_beach2020_isle" the name is already vanished when the zoom is complete...
Doesn't found any delay or duration parameter for the names display in fullscreen parameters
so i don't understand why we don't see the same animation.

Merci pour votre retour.
Pour moi, sur "titiii_beach2020_isle" le nom a déjà disparu quand le zoom est achevé...
Je n'ai trouvé aucun paramètre de délai ou de durée d'affichage du nom dans les paramètres plein écran
donc je ne comprend pas pourquoi nous ne voyons pas la même animation.

@titiii

Je vois le nom de la fille au dessus d'elle au loin. Puis celui-ci disparaît. Comme j'ai mis le nom de la fille pour qu'il apparaîsse toujours dans les configurations du programme, il réapparaît au dessus de la fille, lors du changement de clip, mais en plus gros. Soit que je vois le bas du texte du nom, soit je ne le vois pas du tout. J'imagine que c'est tout dépendant de la longueur du nom.

Ainsi par exemple en petit je vois au loin "Dominno - Punta Cana" au dessus de la fille. Ensuite une fois agrandi, je vois juste "Punta Cana" en plus gros au dessus de la fille. Je crois que le nom devrait être repositionné sur le côté de la fille, et non au dessus. Faites le test avec le même réglage que moi pour l'apparition des noms. Je ne sais pas comment faire une capture d'écran avec une scène, sans qu'elle disparaîssent auparavant, lorsque je pèse sur les touches du clavier.

Quelqu'un peut me dire s'il y a un moyen ?

Merci pour les éclaircissement des dimensions d'écran @stefnev1. 😊

@stefnev1
Merci, je me sens + intelligent grâce à toi 😊
Désolé, j'avais pas vu qu'on était hors sujet, j'ai juste pris ta réponse au bond pour + de détails 👌

@Philours
Les écrans en 4096 sont extrêmement rares, 95% des UHD qu'on trouve dans le commerce sont en 3840 (tous les écrans TV et quasiment tous les moniteurs) pour respecter le 16/9 qui est la norme en TV. Pour utiliser iStripper, le 3840 est très bien. Il faut aussi une carte graphique pas trop minable pour gérer correctement tous ces pixels, bien sûr.
Bon, on arrête le hors-sujet sur les écrans 😉

Are the critics those people who opted for the August pre-buy and are now regretting their decision?

Probably @pickle1. Thanks to the Showroom, I was able to "look ahead" and see that there were a few cards that I wasn't interested in getting. So I didn't get this months pre order.

@sh42n81

One ***** problem with using a single image with transparent portions for both background and foreground is that when using GIMP to do this and then resizing the image before exporting it would lose the colour information from the transparent area - at least with the version of GIMP that was current 18 months ago I have not checked the latest version. This doesn't invalidate the technique but it does mean that you have to be careful when creating the transparent sections - if you do need to resize after creating the "holes" then use the Colors/Curves tool to temporarily make them visible again and and after resizing set them back to transparent (unless, of course, there is no longer a problem with the current version in which case you don't need to bother). Fortunately GIMP has an almost unlimited undo capability which has been of immense use to me with this and other mistakes that I have made editing an image.

@stefnev1
Pour jouer les modèles iStripper en 4k
Alors les 2 sont bons, ou il y en a un à préférer ?

@Philours
Oui, l'UltraHD, aussi appelée 4k par les services marketings, a une résolution de 3840x2160. La "vraie 4k" est en 4096x2160, mais le ratio n'est plus de 16/9 comme les écrans TV dans ce cas.
Et j'arrête là le hors-sujet (charité bien ordonnée commence par soi-même).

Merci pour l'info @stefnev1
Donc si je veux un écran 4k, dans le commerce s'il est noté ; 3840x2160, c'est bon ?

@ComteDracula

Je voulais vous dire que j'ai également un écran 2560x1440.

C'est juste que lorsque je fais jouer les filles sur iStripper, je configure mon écran en 1920x1080, le programme étant optimisé, il me semble pour cette configuration.

La résolution de l'écran doit aller de pair avec la format des shows téléchargés : 1920x1080 pour des shows en 1080p, 2560x1440 pour des shows en 3k et 3840x2160 pour des shows en 4k. Si le format des shows ne correspond pas à la résolution de l'écran, lorsqu'on joue le show en 100% le logiciel va mettre la vidéo à l'échelle, consommant ainsi plus de CPU (ou de GPU si plein écran).

@sh42n81 - there is at least one other oddity with the scene previews. If, as I often do, you use a single image with transparent sections, but with colour information retained for those transpaent sections, for both the background and foreground parts of the scene then those sections are displayed in white in the previews (or at least they are on my machine).

In case you are wondering, I use this so that I only need one image file rather than two and it automatically ensures that the background (which has blend: false) and the foreground (with blend: true) are perfectly aligned. Unfortunately, without resorting to shaders, this technique can not be extended to three or more layers in one image.

@TheEmu

I think I understand what you're saying here. Interesting tip.

@medic01
Congratulations for your first post here. Have fun with iStripper 😎

@Wyldanimal; @TheEmu

Thank you for the lighting discussion. Once we start getting into triangles and vertices, I'm way out of my depth. Apart from a vague awareness that "triangles" are a thing in graphics for gaming, I don't have a foundation of knowledge here.

I have played with many of the "light" properties and have found that they have little apparent effect. Even testing the idea that a light must be placed behind a model and rotated 180 degrees if the model herself is rotated does not seem to hold true. The model in the scene that I'm working on is rotated but she lights up just fine if I place the light closer to the viewer than she is. If I position it deeper, but do not roatate it, she also lights without issue.

I was able to affect the intensity of the light by altering the z value of "pos:" and placing it farther away, and it *seemed* to have a ***** effect if I adjusted the y value. Adjusting the x value did not change the light property in any way that was perctible to me.

In the end, I acheived, to some extent, the effect that I was after by creating a mask of a dark, solid color, and then applying a gradient from transparent to that color.

@Grabandt

At least the numbers seem to add up sensibly for you, mine don't quite do that. However, I made a mistake when I said I had 39 withdrawn cards - I stupidly miscounted - there are only 36 as the program says.

EDIT: The discrepancy, when using the correct value of 36 withdrawn cards, is entirely explained by the 17 SECs that I own, For some reason I thought there were 18.

@ComteDracula
Thank you for your feedback.
For me, on "titiii_beach2020_isle" the name is already vanished when the zoom is complete...
Doesn't found any delay or duration parameter for the names display in fullscreen parameters
so i don't understand why we don't see the same animation.

Merci pour votre retour.
Pour moi, sur "titiii_beach2020_isle" le nom a déjà disparu quand le zoom est achevé...
Je n'ai trouvé aucun paramètre de délai ou de durée d'affichage du nom dans les paramètres plein écran
donc je ne comprend pas pourquoi nous ne voyons pas la même animation.

@gkar45 - I thought it was about 2M, but what's a factor of 10 between friends.

@Grabandt

If you click on my name it will tell you that I have 4605 cards (or at least that is what I see when I do it). However when I look at My Collection it tells me that I have 4658 cards.

Withdrawn cards are not included in the first figure - I have 39 of those though when I display only those it says that I only have 36. I do not know what the explanation is for the rest of the discrepancy - though it is close to the number of Special Event cards.

@Grabandt

If you combine the 16,201 number for those who have made at least one post to the forum with the 3.22% who have the achievement for doing this you end up with a total membership of 503137. This is rather less than the numbers I have seen quoted for installations but is inline with the half millon claim for membership that I seem to remember being quoted somewhere recently.

@Grabandt

What the actual proportion is will depend on how you define "Full Collection". If you take it literally to mean "owning all cards possible" then you will end up with a low proportion. If you relax that a bit then the proportion will go up, however I think that there may be a peak at the very high end (albeit a small one) due to people who are deliberately trying to have full collections purely for the sake of having one and people like me who have got into the habit of buying each card when it is released (though I do tend to make sure that I have got everything at the end of the month just for the sake of it rather than as a deliberate aim - but that make no real difference to the end result).

If, however, you consider only those who have full collections of the sort of cards that they like, or have only excluded certain types of cards that they particularly do not like - whether this be based on the type of performance (e.g. XXX or not, or anal content), some ***** aspect (e.g. bare feet) or the video quality, then the proportion of this sort of "full collection" will be much higher and may well exceed your 20% estimate.

Assuming that the numbers are accurate we can make some firmly based assessments from the data on out achievements page. According to mine

1.45% have the "Nice Shot" achievement for buying 100 cards in a day
3.88% have the "Nice shot" achievement for buying 50 cards in a day
0.58% have the "Patron" achievement for owning 3000 or more cards
3.22% have the "Well done" achievement for making a first post to the forum

but these figures almost certainly count all members, not active members.

Merci @titiii

Très belles scènes.

Je voulais vous dire que j'ai également un écran 2560x1440.

C'est juste que lorsque je fais jouer les filles sur iStripper, je configure mon écran en 1920x1080, le programme étant optimisé, il me semble pour cette configuration.

D'abord j'ai revérifié en 2560x1440, pour vérifier si le problème de nom avec la scène "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod" venait du fait qu'il se serait affiché en dehors de l'écran et ce n'était pas le cas. Il n'y en avait tout simplement pas. Avec votre dernière correction de vos scènes, les noms s'affichent à tous les coups. Je n'ai plus d'***** de noms par intermittence sur aucune des scènes. Il faut dire aussi que j'ai réglé l'affichage des noms à "toujours".

Il y a deux choses que j'ai remarqué. En changeant le nom de la scène "Istripper Backstage - Carstrip_mod" par "Carstrip_Backstage_Standing_mod", la scène ne se retrouve plus à côté des scènes originales de @Carstrip, comme c'était le cas précédemment. Le nom de la fille est très bien situé et visible maintenant sur cette scène. Merci.

J'ai remarqué qu'avec la scène "titiii_beach2020_isle", peut importe la configuration de l'écran, on voit le nom au dessus de la fille au loin, mais lorsque l'image se rapproche, le nom soit n'apparaît plus, soit apparaît à moitié, car il est très agrandi en même temps que la fille.

Je me demandais s'il y avait un moyen de le faire apparaître à une grosseur normale à côté d'elle, seulement lorsque la fille est rapprochée.

Enfin je me demandais s'il n'aurait pas été préférable de faire danser une fille à gauche et deux filles à droite sur le sable à côté de la table pour vos scènes "titiii_beach2020_table" and "titiii_beach2020_table2".

On perd beaucoup de la vision des filles, comme c'était le cas avec la table "Club Penthouse", dont beaucoup ont demandés une modification sans table, car elle cachait trop la fille qui dansait derrière. De plus je remarque que lorsqu'il y a un fille assise derrière la table, on ne lui voit que le dessus de la tête.

En espérant que mes remarques puissent être aidante pour vous, afin d'améliorer les scènes.

Encore merci de nous les partager.


Thank you @titiii

Very beautiful scenes.

I wanted to tell you that I also have a 2560x1440 screen.

It's just that when I play the girls on iStripper, I configure my screen to 1920x1080, the program being optimized, it seems to me for this configuration.

First I rechecked at 2560x1440, to check if the name problem with the "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod" scene was that it would have been displayed outside the screen and it was not. There simply weren't any. With your last correction of your scenes, the names show up every time. I no longer have intermittent missing names on any of the scenes. It must also be said that I set the display of names to "always".

There are two things that I noticed. By changing the name of the scene from "Istripper Backstage - Carstrip_mod" to "Carstrip_Backstage_Standing_mod", the scene no longer ends up next to the original scenes from @Carstrip, as it was previously. The girl's name is very conveniently located and now visible on this stage Thank you.

I noticed that with the "titiii_beach2020_isle" scene, regardless of the screen configuration, we see the name above the girl in the distance, but when the image gets closer, the name either no longer appears, or appears halfway, because it is very enlarged at the same time as the girl.

I was wondering if there was a way to make him appear at a normal size next to her, only when the girl is close.

Finally I was wondering if it would not have been better to have a girl on the left and two girls on the right dance on the sand next to the table for your scenes "titiii_beach2020_table" and "titiii_beach2020_table2".

We lose a lot of the vision of the girls, as was the case with the "Club Penthouse" table, many of which requested a modification without a table, because it hid too much the girl dancing behind. In addition I notice that when there is a girl sitting behind the table, you can only see the top of her head.

Hoping that my remarks can be helpful for you, in order to improve the scenes.

Thank you again for sharing them with us.