Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Last posts - Page 797

  Forum

pantalone
Joined in Nov 2010
2303 post(s)

American Models in Europe

Everything about iStripper
May 8, 2020, 38 answers
Are the famous pornstars better? If it is, than it's in the f-cards since they have more experience with being filmed in masturbation shows, g/g and b/g. They are not better dancers: the best dancers in the last month's were for me Isabelle, Jessika, Angelika Grays, Elis (Czech), Ellie Leen (in the cards, where she's really dancing), Anastasia Brokelyn (a beginning pornstar) and Tina. My impression is that Totem selects the last year more on dance and pole dance skills. That's more important then their nationality.

I'm not convinced that pornstars are likely to be better on iStripper than unknowns, or that they will necessarily be more expensive.

Pornstars certainly seem to be more reliably good than unkowns at xxx, but only a few of them will have developed dance skills. There are many internet unknowns working the clubs and cams in Eastern Europe and they are equally likely to have the skills and beauty to put on a good show here. Of course, most unknowns won't want to strip on the net, but a proportion will and that number depends on economics and their alternative sources of income.

I think Totem finds it difficult to determine in advance who will do a good job. We know they ask for vids from unknowns and we know they've passed on some pornstars doing European tours - because surely the girls' agents will have contacted them. Maybe they were asking for too much money. But equally, we don't know how difficult it is to recruit unknowns, or how selective Totem is.

From the performers' point of view, maybe they sometimes need the money, but also they need the exposure, whether they are unknown or established pornstars. Whether they supplement their modelling with clubs, cams or escorting, a good iStripper performance must be useful.

So I suspect that Totem offers a pretty fixed fee for Take-1s and adjusts their profile in the market so that they get a regular flow of decent applicants (in their view). They'll modify their approach, if the proportion of pornstars/unknowns changes, for example if they fail to book any pornstars for a few months. They'll do the same if quality and hence sales drop off. Maybe they'll stretch a bit for a performer at the top of her career like Jia Lissa, but not enough to attract the likes of Kendra Sutherland.

So show quality will vary over time, depending on many things. Totem will almost certainly ignore the rumblings of the tiny minority of customers who participate in the Forum.
Dorsai6
Joined in Apr 2013
3459 post(s)

Dorsai's Playlist Generator

Everything about iStripper
May 7, 2020, 80 answers
I pulled "play time min".

Play Time min is a card attribute and should be pretty accurate. The staticProperties file contains the total number of frames in all the .vghd clips of a card. That number does not inlcude .demo clips or transition clips. I assume 25 frames per second and use that to calculate the play time. I understand that some cards are recorded at 24 frames per second, so there is the potential for a 4% error. At one time I thought some cards were recorded at 20 frames per second, but that doesn't seem to be true.

The uncertainty is about the Play Time sec in the Clip table. That is an approximation. The staticProperties file contains the size of the card for all available resolutions. From what I can see this is the total number of bytes for the same set of .vghd clips that are used for counting the number of frames. Using the correct resolution for your collection, I calculate average bytes per second for the card. Then I use the actual size of each clip to calculate the play time of that clip. This results in a set of numbers that add up correctly but will be off by the amount that the average bits/second of a clip differs from the overall average for the card. I'm not an expert on video encoded, but I would think that a card with a lot of motion would require more bits/sec than one with less. I do know that when I compare the result of my estimates with the published play time of clips there are significant differences. One advantage of my approach is that it lets me estimate the play time of transition clips.

If I knew a way to capture Totem's numbers, I'd use them, but I don't.