Not really, in my opinion, because they are different cards due to their number of clips.

Maybe they could be displayed as a small stack of cards that could be expanded if the user chooses, This would be similar to the idea that has been previously proposed for stacking together all of a model's cards on the Collection tab.

Moi je préfère le statut MASTER c'est plus évocateur. 😉

Tu vois toujours le bien partout, toi ! 😉😀

Moi je préfère le statut MASTER c'est plus évocateur. 😉

@pickle1

Je pense que vous allez adorer porter fièrement votre nouveau badge 😳😆😆

I think you will love to proudly wear your new badge 😳😆😆

6 being pretty useless.

Pas vraiment, a mon avis, car ce sont des cartes différentes de par leur nombre de clips. Et il est assez utile de pouvoir voir laquelle vous possédez.😉

Not really, in my opinion, because they are different cards due to their number of clips. And it is quite useful to be able to see which you have.

@muttonjeff

When I mouse hover on the Cards icon (6 square boxes) it shows 28 cards for Lana, but in reality there are only 22 (20 + 2 NFT)

Which version is showing 22 Lana Lane's ? I'd love to see all 22 cards in one place instead of scattered around in random tabs and different layout styles and different interactions.

I can only see 20 in version 1.2.530.

Then in the NFT tab another 8 of course. 6 being pretty useless.

I've been banging on about the poor presentation of the NFTs for a while with no response.

Nice

I wish there would be some gifts to "accomplished" members (like Special Event cards)

I see now the inclusion of any NFT cards on the models Other Shows pages but do we really need to see 4 images for each card ?? the layout is becoming a mess
FOR EXAMPLE .... Lana Lane currently shows 8 images for only 2 cards.
When I mouse hover on the Cards icon (6 square boxes) it shows 28 cards for Lana, but in reality there are only 22 (20 + 2 NFT)
I realize there are 4 levels to each card but please consider showing only 1 image for each NFT as we already have a separate tab called My Trading Cards.

Because of all the issues reported with newer releases, I am still using 1.2.376
If my suggestions are already resolved on newer releases, please ignore this posting

They are looking great, a good overhaul 👍

@JayZ971 said;

A status called "MASTER" will be unlocked for all members who have more than 3000 cards. Members with the "MASTER" status will receive a 50% discount on all shows in the iStripper catalog.

Members who possess all the cards in the catalog will be granted the honorary title of "ELITE." This status unlocks not only the 50% discount but also grants free and unlimited access to mobile shows.

So to maintain an "Elite" status. Obviously you'd have all the cards available, but also have to have the "auto-ad" enabled? Buying every show continually, to get free mobile shows? (That's very clever) ✌💚😎

very sexy

😀👍

How many cards do you need for Elite & Master?

New VIP Status

A status called "MASTER" will be unlocked for all members who have more than 3000 cards. Members with the "MASTER" status will receive a 50% discount on all shows in the iStripper catalog.

Members who possess all the cards in the catalog will be granted the honorary title of "ELITE." This status unlocks not only the 50% discount but also grants free and unlimited access to mobile shows.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/53388/1?post=768228
This was a month ago, so I guess still correct.

How many cards do you need for Elite & Master?

Looks awesome!

A-t-il été abandonné ou est-il maintenant bihebdomadaire?

Simplement le départ en congé de la manager en chef, je pense😊 A présent de retour, tout devrait être rétabli 😆
Just the chief manager going on leave, I think 😊 Now back, everything should be back to normal 😆

Has it been discontinued or is now bi-weekly?

Looking good!

Today, after launching the app, the measurements are still not display.I'm using version 1.2.530 64bit with the french GUI.

I looked at many cards, in version 1.2.530, NONE of them display the Measurments.


EDIT:
I guess I just picked all the cards Missing the Vital Statistics
(Sorted by release date)
Going back further, they do show the Statistics

Demo-Videos
I get lucky to pick only cards missing the Vital-Statistics
https://wyldanimal.com/videos/Missing-Vital-Statistics-001.mp4

I get lucky again, but finally find some that have the Vital-Statistics
https://wyldanimal.com/videos/Vital-Statistics-002.mp4

It looks great. Thank you for sharing @LisaParadis

Hello everyone!

As you know, this September we will be introducing two new statuses: “Master” and “Elite”. 🔥

But that's not all – as part of this revamp, we're also giving your badges a fresh makeover, allowing you to proudly display your progress both on iStripper and Discord. 😇

So, without further ado, here are the new and improved badges, from the familiar "Free User" all the way to the esteemed "Elite" member!

Stay tuned for the upcoming launch in September!😍

Hello @deguzege

did you solve your problem ? please read my PM on your iStripper profile

I am currently running 376 and the measurements are displayed there.

Today, after launching the app, the measurements are still not display.
I'm using version 1.2.530 64bit with the french GUI.

@Ullubu I've posted it yesterday : https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/53286/1

@abworkout Anytime..I also hope that they at the least try @orclover's suggestions. Even though I understand the circumstances now come on guys how long has this app been running now? We can't figure something out? I could add a suggestion how about a modified version of a sawhorse or something the height of the taskbar or just underneath that maybe the model could straddle onto and ride a toy that way. I ***** to put too much thought into this but apparently as long as I'm here I'm stuck watching asinine dildo shows all the time so might as well try to help add the one factor to it I actually enjoy. Consider something Totem..figure this out please.

Agreeing with you that this is just ***** and < and > should do the trick too, but they work a bit different. For instance when browsing to another card of the same girl, the < brings me back to the previous card visited where the X would just go back to the store/collection/nft overview.

That is why in my previous post

1 - I said I now understand what you were talking about.

2 - I suggested adding a "<<" button (go back to "start", i.e. the most recent top level overview page) to the "<" (go back one step). The "<<" would do exactly what you have said X used to do.

You could think of "<<" as doing repeated "<" operations until a Top Level overview page was reached. It could even be implemented that way (though suppressing the display of any intermediate steps).

I hope my fansign arrives soon too 😉

@mdekkerThank you. I now understand what people have been talking about. I still regard it as a ***** thing - but at last I can see that there is a real difference. Until now I thought that people were only ***** about the placement (i.e. the "The X is always on the same place" part of your reply) as there had seen no mention of any difference in functionality (which the second part of your first sentence now provides).UPDATE:After a little thought I wonder if what you really want is not a "close" function (which is what the X icon's traditionally do) but a "go back to the most recently viewed top-level page" function, where by "top level page" I mean that page that you get when clicking on one of the home/event/store/previews... tabs. I always found the action of the X icon when browsing the card details a little odd as it did not quite match my idea of "close window" but was closer to a history navigation button. As such I would prefer a different icon (e.g. "<<" or an up arrow) and have it grouped with the "<" and ">" buttons.

Agreeing with you that this is just ***** and < and > should do the trick too, but they work a bit different. For instance when browsing to another card of the same girl, the < brings me back to the previous card visited where the X would just go back to the store/collection/nft overview.

And if you are more in a "classical" mood, don't miss Bonni Gee, your very personal assistant !

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/0e0eb1ef0e04d47f

You've been waiting for her for soooo long !!!!
Yes, here she is, Sirena Milano and her stunning red devil stickybodysuit !!!

Enjoy : https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/441140e8aab2d36f

@stefnev1
Je peux vous dire 81/61/84
Car elles apparaissent pour ma version 1.2.242😉

Where are the girl's measurements, we only have her height and weight in the description page.

Yes, it is back at first step, thanks. ;-)

Problem solved !

Please go back to "Home" on the event page then go back to the progressive, it should be bak to first step :)

@mdekker

Thank you. I now understand what people have been talking about. I still regard it as a ***** thing - but at last I can see that there is a real difference. Until now I thought that people were only ***** about the placement (i.e. the "The X is always on the same place" part of your reply) as there had seen no mention of any difference in functionality (which the second part of your first sentence now provides).

UPDATE:

After a little thought I wonder if what you really want is not a "close" function (which is what the X icon's traditionally do) but a "go back to the most recently viewed top-level page" function, where by "top level page" I mean that page that you get when clicking on one of the home/event/store/previews... tabs. I always found the action of the X icon when browsing the card details a little odd as it did not quite match my idea of "close window" but was closer to a history navigation button. As such I would prefer a different icon (e.g. "<<" or an up arrow) and have it grouped with the "<" and ">" buttons.

Would using the X have made any difference in finding your way back?

Yes. The X is always on the same place, whether browsing the store, your collection or NFT's and brings you back to the section you were browsing in. The click is almost just a reflex. Having to make a choice to click either Store, Collection or NFT's makes you have to think each time what part of the app you are browsing at that time and scan the menu. I'm not making a fuss out of it, I reported it months ago, but I still find the X working more user friendly, though I've (sort of) grown to get used to the new way of navigating.

@Romla Hi, Have you clicked on "sync with server" or have you restarted the app ?

I've done both multiple times, but I still see 56% off selected and 5 credits for redraw.

I am running the latest version 1.2.530.

As for clicking on Collection, I was lost as to what card I was watching. It was a new model (for me) and I didn't know if I saw her in the preview, the collection, store, game, etc. I started looking at her other cards, and couldn't find my way back right away.

Would using the X have made any difference in finding your way back ? A few people keep saying that they want the X back and from what they say they seem to imply that it was providing some functionality that is no longer available. I have asked a few times just what this functionality was but have, as yet, seen no explanation. If you can't describe what the missing functionality is then there is little chance of it being reinstated.

Hello bunnies!


Today we welcome Azelia to the long list of beautiful iStripper models!
This beauty from the Netherlands will make you fall head over heels for her in a second, especially in that lovely black dress!

Her very first show "Simply Delicious" will definitely help you get to know her better!




Have fun!

@Romla Hi, Have you clicked on "sync with server" or have you restarted the app ?

@pickle1 ... thanks.

I've always related the price of a card to the price of a Hershey bar. I've been paying about $1.00 for a card and about $1.25 for a Hershey bar. Today I noticed that the Hershey bar is now $1.60. I guess inflation strikes everywhere.

This reminds me of the phrase "dollars to doughnuts"
as in dollars to doughnuts I will beat you in a race.
the idea is that a dollar is worth more than a doughnut and I am laying odds on myself that I will win the bet.

I paid $1.25 for a doughnut saturday.

@muttonjeff - I wish I could explain why/how I can get three different counts of the cards I own depending upon where I look (looking at my card list, clicking on my account profile or clicking on my avatar in the Forum) 😆

AS for the disparity with @WA 's list showing no missing cards and ours, Agatha has filmed an NFT and it will be number G0078 - wearing the black jump suit you see in her VR180 show. But it has not been released yet (even to the QA team as we are not QA'ing the NFTs) and I genuinely cannot explain that disparity.😧

😄 Beer me. 😎

I am asking especially because I do not want to spend credits on redrawing the cards, only to see the price to change back to 20 percent off after I will click on the Buy button. I cannot confirm if it works without actually buying the cards, but I have already seen the price to change when it was not correct previously in the software, so I am totally blind in this and do not know what happens. That is why I would like to know before paying for redrawing the cards or clicking the Buy button.

I've always related the price of a card to the price of a Hershey bar. I've been paying about $1.00 for a card and about $1.25 for a Hershey bar. Today I noticed that the Hershey bar is now $1.60. I guess inflation strikes everywhere.

If it is giving you the larger discount, then take it. Once Totem has discovered the bug, they might fix it. As for now, they are offering 56% to you, then I would take it.