Merci @stefnev1 pour la réponse.

J'avais pensé à quelquechose de ce genre, mais je croyais que d'autres clips des filles en questions prendraient la place, étant donné qu'il y avait 5 cartes, quitte à rejouer les mêmes clips d'une même carte à deux endroits différents de la scène.

D'après ce que je comprend, et corrigez-moi si je me trompe, disons que j'ai 5 cartes en fonction, et que la scène a 5 filles, ce sera toujours la même carte d'une fille qui va jouer dans un emplacement x de la scène. Car d'après ce que je comprend une même carte ne peut pas jouer à deux endroit en même temps dans la scène.

Si la carte en question à l'emplacement x a des catégories de clip interdit dans le "Deny", ce clip va être remplacé par un rectangle blanc.

Est-ce bien celà ?

Autre chose, mais je n'ai pas remarqué. Si la scène a deux filles, et que j'ai 5 cartes sélectionnés, est-ce que la carte de la fille dans le second emplacement de la scène, disons, et qui n'a pas la catégorie de clip autorisé, sera remplacée par une autre carte que j'ai sélectionné qui a ce genre de clip ? (Bon je présume que oui n'ayant pas remarqué cela lorsque toutes mes filles sont sélectionnées, mais je pose la question tout de même)

Freestyle dancing? Taking a spin on the pole? Lounging by the pool? Whatever floats your boat!

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=10WzSjnICIL3MGSLKKbGmejUxKg6NyrKL

Eighties flower *****! ;)

Now this;

Is more like it!

Smiling girl, enjoying herself... that there is is my girl! :) It's a shame... I dislike the whips and leathers, but I like the tape!

Hips, thighs & babydoll... and it zips in half! :)

Celia Clay...

She is putty in my hands! :)

Another french girl for the collection!

I modify some of your scenes (Carstrip, sh42n81...) for my personal use.
The boat is a good one ;)

Nice job moving the sitting clips to the bed in Voyeur 2. I don't know why I didn't think of that.

Thanks @celine 😎👍 2 of my favorites 🔥🔥😍

Added on August 24:



Added on August 26:

@sh42n81

It would be nice if I'm wrong, but the PC market is shrinking. Even though that is still the best way to watch iStripper shows in my opinion, fewer people are using PCs all the time.

Colud be, but i would say, let's see what the Future brings to us, nothing is carved in stone yet, fingers crossed.
Because i'm trying to Help as much as i can with Linux (until to an specific Point of course),
even i'm the only one native Linux User here. Maybe this is a Sign 😇 Who knows :)

Anyway, i have updated both of my scenes packs (bedroom_neon + glass_office) and add girls names in them.
I'll add names in my future scenes :)

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

Thanks 😎👍

@gkar45

Thank you for helping out. This is an old thread. I solved this problem by finding a way to get the legacy WMVDECOD.DLL codec into my installation.

@Stanston

Further Red Hat is a BIG Player in the Linux World. They are contributing a lot of Code to the Linux Kernel,
and in my Opinion without them, Linux wouldn't be on this Point where it is today.

I agree.

Those are clever ideas. But I doubt that Totem has much interesting in spending time on a Linux port of any kind, with so much of their attention focused on VR and mobile development. It would be nice if I'm wrong, but the PC market is shrinking. Even though that is still the best way to watch iStripper shows in my opinion, fewer people are using PCs all the time.

I modify some of your scenes (Carstrip, sh42n81...) for my personal use.
The boat is a good one ;)

https://mega.nz/folder/Id4R0LRA#GrruwlB7_8U80MMozI6QQw

@titiii
This thread : https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/27449/100?post=677577

Peut-être que le type de clip ne correspond pas à ceux autorisés dans le script du plein écran ?
Par exemple, dans le script ballroom.scn on trouve cette ligne :

clip {
id: Girl01
deny: table, behindtable, fronttable, cage, top, accessories, pole, inout
}

Tout ce qui vient dans le "deny :" est interdit dans cette scène.

@ale221 Hi, please send an email with all the details to [email protected]

@sh42n81

Is is that those could be distrubtion methods if Totem ever makes and official Linux version of iStripper?

Exactly, because you can't install a .deb Package from Debian or Ubuntu in Fedora.
Or for example an Arch Package in Ubuntu or Debian or Fedora.
But a Container as an pre Build Linux Application can Run on every Linux Distribution.
Because all dependencies are included in this Container, you only need to install the Snap or Flatpak Service.
So as i mentioned Snap and Flatpak is available in Ubuntu.

Also in Arch Linux:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Snap
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Flatpak

Also in Debian
https://packages.debian.org/buster/snap
https://packages.debian.org/buster/flatpak

So i'm not that familiar with Container based Installations because i didn't use them before.
And i always ditched the Snap Service after an fresh Install of Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04.
But the Wiki-Article on Ubuntuusers > https://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/snap/
is for myself 100% understandable and it are only a couple of Commands in the Terminal to use it.
So nothing crazy :)

But don't get me wrong, it's not about pushing something, but it was hitting me yesterday like a Lightning Strike.
And yes maybe this could be an possibility for an official Linux Version for iStripper.

As for the future of containters, I think it's pretty solid. Much of the Cloud runs in containers now,
and I don't see that changing until something even more efficient is invented.

That they are solid, that is no Question of course there i'm with you, but i remember on an
Message from an German IT-News Portal Heise Online, which was this one.

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Docker-verkauft-Enterprise-Geschaeft-und-bekommt-neuen-CEO-4585658.html

and her in an Article in your native Language :)

https://containerjournal.com/topics/container-ecosystems/restructured-docker-inc-sells-platform-business-to-mirantis/

And also about the Future of Containers, you should know Red Hat Linux Enterprise.
The only one Commercial Linux Distribution (and CentOS as the Free and Open Source Variant from it),
and they are using also the Container Technology.

https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/containers/what-is-docker

Further Red Hat is a BIG Player in the Linux World. They are contributing a lot of Code to the Linux Kernel,
and in my Opinion without them, Linux wouldn't be on this Point where it is today.

Even Microsoft loves Linux > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/

But i don't trust Microsoft and this Message, but it's my personal Opinion.

So yes a Container based Solution for iStripper on Linux could be indeed an opportunity 😊

Ah, thanks for the heads up. I didn't know that before.

@JayZ971 which discussion thread ?

Anyway, i have updated both of my scenes packs (bedroom_neon + glass_office) and add girls names in them.
I'll add names in my future scenes :)

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

when i get most to all my cards i want i might get this if i have a good VR system

@willyweekly

If we temporarily ignore all but the possibility of winning 10 credits - i.e. getting you money vack for a card then on average for each 100 cards bought you would expect to win 50 times - but with a standard deviation on that number being equal to its square root which is just over 7. This in turn means that you should not be at all surprised to get a result that is anything up to 2 standard deviations away (i.e. anything in the range 36 to 64, in fact about 50% of the results should be outside of this range) nor should you be too surprised by results that are 3 deviations away from the average (though at that level you can legitimately begin to wonder).

Your results are quite consistant with the true probabilty of winning being 50%. Including the other prizes would significantly complicate the calculations but not in a way to invalidate the hypothesis that the odds are 50-50. If the larger prizes are considered then the odds of winning the most common prize of just 10 credits will go down so that in the short term you will tend to lose but the rare wins of 50 and even rarer wins of 100 would compensate this.

Now I do not say that the game is definately fair in this technical sense with regard to the long term outcome, but as yet I have seen no proof that it is not. Indeed I would expect that there would be a small bias in favour of the house - like that given by any zeroes on a roulette wheel.

Note, a casino can make a profit on an absolutely fair game like this (e.g. a roulette wheel with no zeroes) because given a run of small losses a customer may stop playing whereas the casino, having deeper pockets, can typically afford to wait longer and also gets the benefit of the averaging effect of having many customers which damps out the random variations,

I am also curious if the odd are different because you can't win cards. If you can't win one of the prizes, then that must change the probability.

In at least some of the previous scratch games if your collection rules out winning free cards then this possibility has been invisibly replaced by getting your money back, which for this game would be a 10 credit prize. I do not know if that is the case for the current game.

I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Is is that those could be distrubtion methods if Totem ever makes and official Linux version of iStripper?

As for the future of containters, I think it's pretty solid. Much of the Cloud runs in containers now, and I don't see that changing until something even more efficient is invented.

@TheEmo

I did not come to this conclusion. In the end I got this SEC after buying 120 scratch cards, and had 10 credits more than I started with. For me there does not seem to have been much of a change.
OK, so based on your claim that you were getting about the same "break even" odds as in previous events, I decided to buy another 100 cards "for science" and then post my exact results from both sets of 100 cards.

First 100 cards, which I bought back on Friday (prior to my earlier post) yielded the following:
66 -- no win
30 -- 10 credits
4 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC
(net loss of 500 credits)

Second set of 100 cards, purchased today:
27 -- no win
67 -- 10 credits
6 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC
(net loss of 30 credits)

Combined, over the 200 cards, that makes:
93 -- no win
97 -- 10 credits
10 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC

As you can see, there's a HUGE difference in the "no-win" versus "10-credit" outcomes between the two sets.

Because of the relatively large prizes of 50 and 100 credits compared to the 10 credit cost of a scratch card, with corresponding low odds of winning them, you need to try far more than 100 cards before you can make a reasonable estimate of the long term odds for these games.
While I totally agree that 100 (or even 200) cards is not a statistically significant number for determining the odds of things like the 100-credit wins, it should be a realtively decent number of trials for determining the "10-credit" and "no win" chances. And while it's true that the differences between my results on Friday and my results today could be due to just very odd luck, I personally think (especially given Totem's track record for screwed-up coding) that it's probably more likely that something was very broken with the game before, and they fixed it sometime between Friday and today. When did you buy your 120 cards?

My hunch (just a guess) was that for people like me with all the cards that couldn't get normal card wins, perhaps the game was previously giving them a "no win" in place of a normal-card win, and is now giving them a "10-credit" win in place of the normal-card win. Indeed, my results today look much, much closer to what I've seen in past scratch-off events.

[Edit: Just for reference... In both cases (both days), I purchased all the scratch cards in 20-card batches, though I wouldn't suspect that it makes any difference.]

I am also curious if the odd are different because you can't win cards. If you can't win one of the prizes, then that must change the probability.

Petite question.

Hier soir j'ai décidé de faire jouer 5 cartes. J'ai déselectionner toutes les autres, car je ne voulais voir que les filles de ces cartes en les faisant danser dans différentes scènes.

Je ne suis rendu compte que parfois dans les scènes avec plusieurs filles qui dansent, il y avait des rectangles blancs, qui apparaîssaient à la place des filles.

Est-ce que cela s'est déjà produit pour vous, et est-ce que quelqu'un sait pourquoi cela se produit ?

Je n'ai jamais remarqué cela, lorsque toutes mes cartes sont sélectionnées.

J'ai fait une recherche sur le forum, mais je ne trouve rien à ce sujet.

Il faut dire que ma mauvaise compréhension de l'anglais n'aide pas.

Je ne suis pas capable de faire de capture d'écran, car la scène disparaît, lorsque je veux le faire.

Merci.

hey i'm a new user and i was checking the slot machine. After running it I clicked buy ... thinking it would open another screen to finish. Can I get a refund for these credits used on cards? I didn't even get to download them.

Hi @sh42n81

Just in case you are reading still here :)
Do you know those Moments where you have this AHAA! Effect?

One possibility which i didn't think about yet is SNAP > https://snapcraft.io/store

Inside of Ubuntu you can use the Snap Service beside the APT Package Manager too.
Snap's are acting as a Container, which are containing all dependencies for that specific Package.
I don't like Snap at all, just like Wine but maybe this could be a possibility ... maybe,
for iStripper for Linux. And Snap is maintained by Canonical.

But i think Canonical will not allow Adult Content in the Snap Store, like Google and Apple.

But there is also the Flatpak Service > https://flatpak.org/
And Flatpak is in the official Ubuntu Repo > https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/flatpak

Flatpak is indipendent from Canonical, and an Community only Project.
Otherwise i'm not sure about the Future about those Container based Formats like Docker for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docker_(software)

I'm not sure about my Idea but maybe it's worth to share this Information.

@7171al71

looks good,
it adds that extra ambiance to make it feel a bit more life like.

@Wyldanimal : Thanks! I'm going to 50% with this, now comes all the fine part of adjustments and several other things, but it looks beautiful. I am already understanding your code better (the scene with your lighting gets along very well, they are like soul mates ...😂)

I attach a partial demo

Creative room special edition (Demo Video):
https://youtu.be/KdzdhWByPAU

Thank You @TheEmu for the tips & pointers. Now I can see what I needed to do Thanks to @Carstrip (you are a life saver !! appreciate it 👍)

I now have a sincere appreciation for All of you scene makers 👍

@JayZ971 - After my previous post I also noticed that you have not properly closed the clipnamesprites. For every { at the start of any node there must be a } at its end. Unfortunately the system does not ***** when you make a mistake of this type, things just go wrong because the various nodes are not nested as they are intended to be.

More specifically you omitted the closing { for the first clipnamesprite, so everything else in the scene is nested inside it. This means, among other things, that any pos: clauses specify positions relative to that of that first clipnamesprite - hence the offsetting that you see in the final scene. And, as I said in my previous post. the clip names get hidden behind everything else in the scene because you have put the clipname sprites as the first elements in the scene.

For whoever wants the name sprites on the 3 fullscreen scenes from @titiii glass scenes yesterday, I just added them, link to .scn files below 😉
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DylOSkIJ-pOmImQK9VcGCgRYztdiZZH4/view?usp=sharing

@JayZ971 - you seem to have moved the clipNameSprites to the beginning of the camera node rather than to the end. Because of this they are behind everything else in the scene, including the background. Move them to just befre the final "}" in the .scn file. That character should be the closing brace corresponding to the opening "{" of the camera node.

For a simple scene

Camera { // start of camera node
.. camera parameters go here
.. various sprites for the various scene elements go here
clipnameSprite{ //start of clipnamesprite node
.. clipname sprite parameters
} // closes the clipnamesprite
} // closes the camera node - should be last thing in file

Typically you want the clipNameSprites to be in the foreground rather than be obscured by other scene elements, so they go last in the .scn file.

@Dfner

But my point actually was that there was one way to get SEC without any gambling element involved. And that was purchasing that Premium membership when it was introduced (like I did). That way you got your Joker card, and therefore, effectively, an SEC of your choice without any gambling.

You're right, there was also a Joker card given when you filled the thermometer during last year's Black Friday promotion. This did involve gambling, but still everyone had a clear way of getting it.
This is actually not a bad idea btw: allowing everyone to win a Joker card after spending a certain amount.


@TheEmu

What was the second route of getting the 1st SECs if it wasn't gambling?
The second route was gambling. It was a way of gettiing the SECs. Without this second route there was absolutely NO way of getting a SEC if you had missed (or deliberately ignored) the original event. It was a solution that did provide the requested second way of getting the cards - that some people did not like that way of getting them does not mean that it was not a solution - albeit not a universaly acceptable one but no one ever claimed that it was.

Sorry I misunderstood your post at first, I thought you said there was a second route, then came the gambling. I get your point.
Just saying again, I'm fine with SECs part of a package: you buy the package, you get the SEC. That's the main difference for me with SECs you get only through gambling, even the 1st SECs (which haven't been offered in any other way than gambling since). You take part in the promotion, well... the chances are higher you don't get the SEC. Therefore, if most of the time you can't get what you're playing for, that's not a solution.

You can put it in a simple way: if there is another way, there will probably be less people taking part in the scratch game. If people choose not to gamble, that might just be because it's not worth the time, credits and all unwanted cards.
Exactly correct, and that is pretty well the point I have been trying to make all along. Changing things is likely to cost Totem money unless they are careful, Changing things in the simple ways that have been suggested would almost certainly cost them money - would you willingly reduce your profits ?

How can you be sure this will reduce Totem's profits?
You seem to be concerned with Totem's profits from the scratch game but you said many times yourself you get the SECs for free and even earn credits.
Many members don't gamble, if Totem gets them to buy a package with the SEC they want, that's another way of generating profit.
Plus, as I said, gambling can stay, members who want it could still gamble.

I took part in the scratch game several times this year, I gave it a go, thinking "ok, maybe we can get an SEC this way" the only SEC I got was Anastasiia which was "given" automatically after 30 or so scratch cards. Well, I came to the conclusion this method simply doesn't work, I ended up with about 100 cards I didn't want for twice or 3 times the price. That made me think, why pay for something I don't want? Since then, I realised what I ***** in these games made me want to spend less here. How is that for profit?
I haven't spent as much as members with a full collection, but most members have a partial collection. And if these members realise chasing SECs through gambling is pointless, the scratch game will become less and less profitable.

We can only speculate on the intentions, but the odds show that this game is designed to make most members pour in a lot of credits, not for most members to win an SEC.
Yes we can speculate on the intentions, but whatever the intensions were the gambling games did provide a second way to get the SECs, no matter how unpopular that way turned out to be it was still a way to get the cards.

Gambling is indeed a 2nd way of getting the package SECs, and has been the only way up to now to get the majority of SECs.

@JayZ971 - also the clipNameSprites, like all scene elements, should be inside the camera node - i.e. pkaced before what had been the closing "}" character if the .scn file not after it as you seem to have done.

@JayZ971 - for the X component of each clipNameSprite's pos: clause I would suggest that you use the same value that was used for the X component of the pos: clause in the corresponding clipSprite. This will vertically align each girl with her name.

@TheEmu @Stanston

I did move the clipNameSprites to the camera section & adjusted the values.....this was the result. I'm going to try later, may even just delete the scene. Thank you again for all your help.

@JayZ971

what would be the values for each girl ?

Do it like myself, just Testing it out through changing these Values :)

@JayZ971 - for the X component of each clipNameSprite's pos: clause I would suggest that you use the same value that was used for the X component of the pos: clause in the corresponding clipSprite. This will vertically align each girl with her name.

Change the
pos: 500, 500Value for Girl02. At the moment both Names are laying on top of each other :)

@Stanston

This is roughly where I want the names to go, what would be the values for each girl ?

@JayZ971 - also the clipNameSprites, like all scene elements, should be inside the camera node - i.e. pkaced before what had been the closing "}" character if the .scn file not after it as you seem to have done.

Change the

pos: 500, 500

Value for Girl02. At the moment both Names are laying on top of each other :)

@Stanton

I agree with Ragorn & stefnev1 we're having a respectful conversation here, just expressing different views, so no need to ban anyone.
Grabandt's post had nothing insulting nor aggressive.

@JayZ971 - You needed to put the clipNameSprite in a gap between scene elements, not nested inside a clipSprite. I would suggest putting it immediately after the closing "}" character of the clipSprite.

@JayZ971
I uploaded the Content from one of my Scenefiles, check it out 😉
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XQBdyxMx8G/

Thanks @TheEmu @Stanston

The scene that I am trying to put the name sprite on has 2 girls. I moved the clipNameSprite to the bottom of the .scn file & got it to work for one of the girls. So I guess that I need to do another clipNameSprite for the other girl.....

I did add the other clipNameSprite......now neither name works.....suggestions ? (screenshot)

@7171al71

yes, use it.

I agree with @RAGORN : as the conversation stay in respect and fair-play between all the members, no ban is necessary. We are adults and we can have a serious discussion between us (and Totem which is reading what we write, believe me).
@stefnev1 - my biggest problem with this is that I am getting bored with the circular and repetitive nature of the conversation. Especially as it is not the first time the subject has been aired in the Forum.

😟

Well, that's the thing with most arguments here - since there's nothing really to discuss, apart from the quality of girls which one may or may not like.

There's a couple of topics taht will resurface from time to time:

Ethnic diversity,
Costumes,
Props,
Special cards,
[put whatever you think is boring here]

@pickle1

Especially as it is not the first time the subject has been aired in the Forum.

I know, but this thing is not against the rules edicted by Totem for the forum, it's not considered as "spam".

@JayZ971
I uploaded the Content from one of my Scenefiles, check it out 😉
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XQBdyxMx8G/

@Wyldanimal: your scene lighting code is amazing !!! (+WA - Lights2 = 1080p Camera2.scn)
I'm doing a hybrid scene and it looks spectacular. It is a very good wine for my eyes.
I want to leave your lighting code 100% pure and merge it with this special scene.
Once I finish it, can I publish it with your corresponding acknowledgments?
Is it possible that the lighting resolution is 4K?

@JayZ971 - You needed to put the clipNameSprite in a gap between scene elements, not nested inside a clipSprite. I would suggest putting it immediately after the closing "}" character of the clipSprite.

@JayZ971
Sorry, i don't use this feature for myself and so i don't include it in my scenes...
Perhaps i should considerate add names if some of you use it !

It is easy to add by yourself, just open a .scn with a text editor, add...

clipNameSprite {
scale: 0.75, 0.75
pos: 500, 500
source: Clip
}

...anywhere in a space and that it !

All you have to do now is : name correctly the source (Clip, Girl, Girl01...) copy paste if more than 1 girl (with different source name) adjust pos: horizontal, vertical

Tried to add, didn't work.....please check discussion thread

@titiii

I tried to add the girls name & show to the .scn file and this is the result. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks