Not bad, but if it depends on me, she will not be talent of the year. I'll give my vote to another girl 😊😛

Gia Ren a long with Mia Sun are two of me favorite models here from Spain. Gorgeous sexy young woman Gia, great to see her as a talent of the month.

I cannot think of a better model for May...

I count 959 iStripper model names
This is from the names.xml file in the data folder
I removed the "B" series of cards and all of the Beta Test Cards and the iDancer cards
so it is just series "a", "c", "d", "e", and "f"

I imported the names.xml in to excel
then did a Filter of Unique Values on the Models names
To further filter the DUO cards, here is a Formula I used
it filters to the 2nd Models name in a DUO card

=IF(IFERROR(SEARCH("&",B1),FALSE),RIGHT(B1,LEN(B1)-(SEARCH("&",B1)+1)),B1)

Then Apply the Unique Filter a 2nd time and you end up with 959 names

Not This Year !

I checked all the girls that can be seen in duo cards.

There are no solo cards in series A, C, E and F for the following girls:
Rachel Evans - 3 duo cards
Amandine - 2 duo cards (but has one card in series D: d0090)

...Only people's assertiveness towards hazards can make things change here

👍

Talent of the year !

Or you could use my Playlist Generator. It isn't quick, but you don't have to do much work. After it loads it will tell you how many models are in your collection and you can also get counts by country, hair color, and even bust size.

We will see what the team will do - but no matter what will be - I have a lesson - from now on zero hazards ... the system generates errors, advertising and asking for a refund of 1000 credits is stressful for me and the billing analysis itself took me 6 hours - it's like a day at work ... I'm not talking about nerves, stress, showing someone that there are errors somewhere, but hidden so that they do not notice them immediately ... I repeat for others - every game is a gamble and system errors show that you can lose much more than the usual play ... It's not worth it, people It's not worth it. Only people's assertiveness towards hazards can make things change here

As I said, during the game "the system just went stupid" on Friday and stole 1000 credits from me entering incorrect data into the system and it shows the proof in the bill for April 23, 2021 - I sent the team exactly shown errors and "disappearing credits" from position for the next position .... I do not know how it happens but the system makes mistakes and credits disappear A man who is absorbed in the game may not even notice it and then the team claims that the customer is wrong because 1000 credits are shown in the billing less than at the start of the game .... We'll see what the team does, because so far I'm still behind with a loss of 1000 credits. But I analyzed the billing and sent to the support and the team, errors that show that I was right ...

They probaby should change the name of this award as it is becoming something of a farce. Nothing against Miss Ren, I have some of her cards.
Maybe change the name to top performer of the month or top seller.
Perhaps you guys should consider starting a Trending Girls sectionof the forum. At least then we can see which girls are generating interest and these strange "Talent" awards will make more sense.

It is an Access-database and I'm not programming, just creating an Access-database with their tools.
I don't know anything about programming.😦
And I have no intention to learn it anymore

@batavus

Well if you want to create a database of which cards in your collection support which resolutions you could use a command line tool to search the cards' xml files

Roughly

1 Open a command shell
2 CD to the vghd\data directory
3 Enter the command findstr /ls "<resolution>" ?????.xml >resolutions.txt

This will give you a text file, resolutions.txt, that contains a list of card ids and which resolutions that they support, here is an excerpt from a run I have just done

a0825\a0825.xml: <resolution>720p</resolution>
a0826\a0826.xml: <resolution>720p</resolution>
a0827\a0827.xml: <resolution>720p,1080p</resolution>
a0828\a0828.xml: <resolution>720p,1080p</resolution>
a0829\a0829.xml: <resolution>720p,1080p</resolution>
a0830\a0830.xml: <resolution>720p,1080p</resolution>
a0831\a0831.xml: <resolution>720p</resolution>
a0832\a0832.xml: <resolution>720p</resolution>

You can then use this any way you want, e.g. load it into a spreadsheet.

@batavus Also some of the older cards were remastered to a higher quality! This is usually indicated on the card by a mirror photo. For instance, do a search for Armina card a1440. That card is an example of one being updated. Also, that particular card was used for the achievment badge, MAY THE 4th BE WITH YOU! Today!

bravo Gia Ren 👌

I was going to do it that way, but I'm making a database, first doing all owned cards, afterwards all cards not owned. But that is perhaps the best way, I'll see

It's May 4th!

I have 952 different girls including Rachel Evans (no single show) and i also own all the Classic shows.
I have also 391 different Duos and the one Quad-Girl-Show.

How do i know? I've listed them in an Excel Sheet!

For Rachel Evans there is a solution - get her back to iStripper to do a solo show. She might just be still active, new work listed for last year and mid 30s only. I admit I'm crazy, it's an unusual reason for a return, but then she would get counted.

@pickle1 - yes you are right. I thought I had checked this long ago when I was trying to make sense of the various collection size numbers, but obviously I was wrong. I find this rather surprising as duo cards do appearon both models details "other cards" pages (at least I have seen cases where that is so, maybe there are a few that don't).

It would therefore seem that the concept of "complete sets" for models' cards may not as well defined as I had thought that it was.

Are there a few models, from shows a long way back, where they only did duos, so no solos. Would they be counted in either method.I think they would only get counted by the "Sort by model name" method if their name was the first of the pair for at least one card. But duo cards appear under both models names in the account profile.In the past I have suggested that a Model Centric view of My Collection be provided - one in which all the cards for each model appeared as a single pile which when clicked on would show you just the cards in the pile. Duo cards would then be in two of the piles.

Sorry @TheEmu - I've got to contradict you - in your profile a duo show only appears under the lead (1st) girl's name - so Rachel Evans would not appear. The show may appear in your Account History with both names.

Are there a few models, from shows a long way back, where they only did duos, so no solos. Would they be counted in either method. Might only be 3 or 4? Just a thought, depends how accurate you want to be. Sorry if your day is now more complicated.
------
Rachel Evans is one such - never it seems did any solo shows.

So right.

I double-checked my list and now the total of 664 cards seems to be right.

Thanks again!

I thought there would be a better way, but no easy way.

What could be much easier than going to the store or your "My Collection" and using the Quality filter to see all the cards available or that you own that are of a particular quality ?

It must take all of 5 seconds to do.

if their name was the first of the pair for at least one card

Looks like poor Rachel Evans would then be missed on all methods as she is listed on all three shows after the models she appeared with. May be she is the only one to have no solo shows.
On the app you can find her by searching her name, but on the website no results.

What I did was open up my profile, hover over all the shows until I reach the first I don't own, cut-and-paste (copy) into an Excel spreadsheet and then see what row number you go down to.

For such excercises I tend to copy and paste into Notepad++, or any other text editor that shows line numbers, as it is quicker to start than Excel (which I don't always have available anyway).

Are there a few models, from shows a long way back, where they only did duos, so no solos. Would they be counted in either method.

I think they would only get counted by the "Sort by model name" method if their name was the first of the pair for at least one card. But duo cards appear under both models names in the account profile.

In the past I have suggested that a Model Centric view of My Collection be provided - one in which all the cards for each model appeared as a single pile which when clicked on would show you just the cards in the pile. Duo cards would then be in two of the piles.

Are there a few models, from shows a long way back, where they only did duos, so no solos. Would they be counted in either method. Might only be 3 or 4? Just a thought, depends how accurate you want to be. Sorry if your day is now more complicated.
------
Rachel Evans is one such - never it seems did any solo shows.

Reallly don't get this ..
My vote would have gone to Sharon White...
Maybe next month...

Liya Silver & Jia Lissa - Diver Down
Viola & Lola Reeves

Those are my favorites from the ones I have

What I did was open up my profile, hover over all the shows until I reach the first I don't own, cut-and-paste (copy) into an Excel spreadsheet and then see what row number you go down to.

I've got 677 and it took me just 2 minutes to find out.

😊

PS - you have 662

And an extra note: as per the posts by @wrightsayswow and @WyldAnimal, the method I describe above will only reflect the girls CURRENTLY available - it will not include deleted shows, etc. For that figure, you'll have to use @stefnev1 's suggestion.

Thank you guys!

Actually, I hadn't thought about the Excel trick.
It won't take into account the canceled cards, but I have no canceled cards and the SECs I own are all from girls already in my collection, so the total of 662 is correct.

Thanks again and have a nice day!

True - but counting the girls in your collection is going to take quite some time though it would be more accurate - my method may have some omissions but it is quicker and you can always count up your SEC's and deleted cards and add them on .

😉

@pickle1
When you are using your profile, you don't see the SEC and the cards withdrawn. But Your Collection is complete with the entire number of cards you have purchased (so the models).

What I did was open up my profile, hover over all the shows until I reach the first I don't own, cut-and-paste (copy) into an Excel spreadsheet and then see what row number you go down to.

I've got 677 and it took me just 2 minutes to find out.

😊

PS - you have 662

And an extra note: as per the posts by @wrightsayswow and @WyldAnimal, the method I describe above will only reflect the girls CURRENTLY available - it will not include deleted shows, etc. For that figure, you'll have to use @stefnev1 's suggestion.

@BJlover
Make a sort by model's name in your collection, then count them.

Hello everyone!

I exactly know how many cards I have, but not how many girls.
Is there a simple way to know how many girls I have in my collection?

Thanks!

Speaking as a member - why is Gia Talent Of The Month in May when her last show was released in March?

These rarely make sense, and they said sometime ago that it's based on the sales, too.

In March Mia Sun was TOTM and her last release was in January, all her other shows released last year, so most certainly no logic to it. Except I guess that means Mia Sun sold very well indeed.
Thought it might be Angelika Grays this month, nothing against Gia Ren, I have all her shows and very happy about that.

Superbe modèle, j'ai pour le moment 7/12 de ses shows, mais j'en ajoute de temps en temps progressivement.

OK

J'étais passé à côté de ces deux superbes scènes:
https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/29408/53?post=681487

https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/29408/58?post=692676

Ooh, Gia!
I'm glad to have you in dreams, full of pleasure!

Speaking as a member - why is Gia Talent Of The Month in May when her last show was released in March?

These rarely make sense, and they said sometime ago that it's based on the sales, too.

Speaking as a member - why is Gia Talent Of The Month in May when her last show was released in March?

I really like some of Gia's shows, but I dislike most of her costumes. Still, she's an entertaining model who looks different in each show I've got, so that's a plus. Thanks for performing for us, Gia!

We are proud to announce that Gia Ren is our May Talent of the Month. Her beauty and amazing energy has not been left unnoticed!
During her first take, Gia came to us with long curly hair only which gave a sense of youth to her character, only to come back as a femme fatale with straight hair for her second take. Gia has proven to be very resourceful during her shows as she knows how to get into character all while making it her own as she did with her alluring take on the little riding hood with her basket full of dildos!!
Her jaw droppin performances as well as the fact that she has become a fan-favorite, Gia has clearly earned her this honor!



Some worthwhile comments on her performances:


"Gia has become one of iStripper's finest. She can do it all from high glamour to sexually explicit." (Ron****)

"Gia is so amazingly beautiful… from her pretty face, to her lovely breasts, her perfect figure, her gorgeous pussy, her terrific butt, down to her fabulous shapely legs." (wel******)

"Gia is tall, athletic and sexy girl. Good dancer, sensual moves. Magnific XXX shows, for sexiness, moaning and dildo action. " (Gn**)


Thank you to Gia Ren for being the amazing talent she is, we are delighted to have nominated her this month!

I would also add the equipment used (and or post production methodology) for the A series cards took a bit of a leap around A600ish... (there is a noticable change in quality after A600ish in spite of the 720p constant resolution)

It is possible that may apply to some of the C series cards as well, but I have not researched that to date.

Video Demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlhTmowZRLs

@all
Thank you all for your answers.
I thought there would be a better way, but no easy way.😦

I decided to participate in the progressive pack. At least there is some choice there. The calculations for cost are invariably wrong...stating that my cost is less than it actually is. On my first purchase, the stated cost was 91 credits. The actual cost was 110 credits. Now, I have since figured that 110 credits was the correct cost, but this looks like a bait and switch...not a good look. Other packs also stated a cost less than the actual. Fourth pack stated cost 81.53 credits....actual cost 93.5 credits.

Also, on two occassions the system generated an original cost of 250 credits for the ten cards...implying that all cards were full price...even though the packs contained older "medium" resolution cards. I was ***** to spend two credits on each of these packs to redraw lest I pay full price for medium resolution cards.

Tant que tu as le gardon qui frétille en regardant de jolies filles sur iStripper, tout va bien 😆😆😆
(Elle est de moi celle-là).

👍😎