gezzz...can somebody tell me what the naming convention is for these darn VGHD files? I just need to know how to distinguish the "No nudity" from the "explicit" shows etc. It was well documented in VirtualGirl2 and stripsaver but is it some big secret with this software?
It seems to me there is hardly no explicit shows since I see the same clips over and over again when I check full nudity and very explicit options. SS2 and VG2 had much more variety. :(
If someone can tell me what the naming convention is maybe I can troubleshoot this problem.


Thanks

From another thread. There are several out there that explain all this.

"Totem has indeed NUMBERED the CLIPS if I'm not mistaken. But, it's TRICKY. The LAST THREE NUMBERS is the KEY, as follows:

1nn = No NUDITY 2nn = TOPLESS 3nn = NUDITY 4nn = EXPLICIT."

Another thing to remember is that while some girls do a good number of Nude/Explicit type 3+4 shows, most seem to have more of the type 1+2 shows on their cards.

And it is possible to change the names with no ill effect. I've changed a few that I thought should be changed and they now show up when the matching type is checked.

One show that I changed was in Viki(Pilot), a show was tagged as non-nudity (type 1), but she was totally nude (type 3). Talk about a surprise show.

@n3cr

could you post the complete animation file name please as totem definately doesn t want nudity in non-nude codes so we can change this file name.

also some animations are very hard to code

example: Jewel,Marie ...

those 2 ladies are so teasing that it s often difficult to decide a 3 or 4 code

regards

HHO

There are definitely more non-nude/topless animations. It is also true non-nude/topless animations tend to be much shorter.

You can see the 'raw' numbers at http://www.civxl.net if that helps.

There is also a lot of difference between what one model and another in terms of explicitness. Some are naked with more no touching and more explicit angles than just naked. Through to touching and more.

The Viki animations have been reported before, I am not sure if they are fixed. I marked both 64105 and 66303 in a0176 as naked.