Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.
0
flac vs mp3 how will be win Fórum / Espaço para novos usuários
Boldmistress
De em Jun 2011 15 post(s)
January 8, 2012
?
kiss
kiss
shodan084
De em Dec 2007 1658 post(s)
January 8, 2012 (edited)
How many times have you heard of a portable FLAC player or iFLAC? (catchy!;) I think I'll stick with mp3...
plus my ripper will do a range of mp3 sizes, all I can do is convert FLAC files.
plus my ripper will do a range of mp3 sizes, all I can do is convert FLAC files.
hungerman
De em Apr 2008 37 post(s)
January 9, 2012 (edited)
This makes me assume you use an iMp3, well that's catchy too.
By the way I suppose this whole thing should go into http://www.virtuagirl.com/forumTopic.php?foId=9 at the most, if it has any place around here at all, not that I would care.
On the other hand while I'm filling into this form, I could also leave my thoughts on the topic, here:
This question makes no sense on its own. These formats aren't competing, they are for different purposes.
FLAC is for having your audio compressed without any loss in quality because of the compression.
Mp3 is the oldest format that is for reducing the size of the audio file, thus making it better suited for portability, and being compatible with the broadest range of devices.
That is all there is to it. If you're asking this because you want to know if you should choose a certain player for its support of FLAC, then decide whether you are unsatisfied with the quality of your mp3 songs, and if yes and you would like to sacrifice the size of the music collection you can carry with you, then go for FLAC. But even then, you wouldn't always be able to find what you want in the FLAC format.
Finally to make the topic more meaningless: the audible difference between FLAC and an mp3 with better bitrate (192 kbps or more) is minimal or none. On the other hand, nowadays the storage capacity of portable devices and memory cards have increased so much, that FLAC format requires less compromise from the device owner.
So at the end of the day the short answer is: Who cares?...
By the way I suppose this whole thing should go into http://www.virtuagirl.com/forumTopic.php?foId=9 at the most, if it has any place around here at all, not that I would care.
On the other hand while I'm filling into this form, I could also leave my thoughts on the topic, here:
This question makes no sense on its own. These formats aren't competing, they are for different purposes.
FLAC is for having your audio compressed without any loss in quality because of the compression.
Mp3 is the oldest format that is for reducing the size of the audio file, thus making it better suited for portability, and being compatible with the broadest range of devices.
That is all there is to it. If you're asking this because you want to know if you should choose a certain player for its support of FLAC, then decide whether you are unsatisfied with the quality of your mp3 songs, and if yes and you would like to sacrifice the size of the music collection you can carry with you, then go for FLAC. But even then, you wouldn't always be able to find what you want in the FLAC format.
Finally to make the topic more meaningless: the audible difference between FLAC and an mp3 with better bitrate (192 kbps or more) is minimal or none. On the other hand, nowadays the storage capacity of portable devices and memory cards have increased so much, that FLAC format requires less compromise from the device owner.
So at the end of the day the short answer is: Who cares?...
Você ainda não está autorizado a participar
Como usuário gratuito iStripper, você não tem permissão para responder a um tópico no fórum ou criar um novo tópico
Mas você poderá acessar as categorias e conceitos básicos e entrar em contato com nossa comunidade.!