XXX is here to stay...

@HansSachs - I was not disputing that. It is not what I would prefer but I am quite happy to acknowledge that the present mix is probably about right for Totem.

I was, however, disputing the text that I quoted, namely

The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

It was this, and only this, that I was making a brief comment on.

The casualy accepted statement that more variety, no matter what, within a card will automatically satisfy more people is not true.

If it was true then it would imply that Totem should include all sorts of activities, beyond simple XXX action, in many or most cards even if many or most of their customers would find them repulsive. There are almost certainly a significant number of members that do not buy any card that is tagged "anal" and including that in all cards would, in my opinion, reduce overall sales. The same is also likely to be the case with XXX rated clips - hence the existance of cards that do not have any and the likelyhood that such cards will continue to be made

The recent apparent trend to more XXX, and slightly more extreme forms of it (I am thinking of the "squirting" cards) is beginning to affect my purchasing habits. I will not be automatically purchasing every card from now on, though I will probably still buy almost all at least for the next month or so but eventually I will reduce to the point where my Premium membership will not be cost effective and I will cancel it. I had rather arbitrarily put off making this change until I had reached the 5000 card mark but had been considering it since the start of the year.

Superb!!
She well deserves this...her assets are just awesome and anyone would love to see all those with eyes wide open...
She is now in my wishlist..🙂

Sup'! @Azalin! You're a very selective buyer! Your buying restraint is legendary! I hope all is well your way! ✌💚😎

Definitely Mila Azul, she's just gorgeous.

@Azalin

Welcome to the Forums !

13 years and I'm still here too...
I think It's an addiction.
it's too good to let go...

I had over 300 cards available in the store from 2019 and 2020 even excluding the previous 30 days ones. Why aren't any of these selected then?

Like all of the Events, not all of the win options will be to your liking,
in that case your option is to spin again, or to not play.

Randomness is just that, it's random...
5 spins, 40 spins, 100 spins is not enough to draw precise evaluation of the random odds.

the results of the spin are based on the NOT owned cards for that particular Member.
but it doesn't mean that ALL of the results will be as expected.

So if the spin results do not meet with your likings, then you can Spin again, or not.

I used to play roulette, quite a lot.
I spend a hours tracking the spin results to make my own Hot and Cold number list.
when I had Cold numbers than had not come up in 200 spins
I'd start to bet heavier on them, and double up every 5 spins
Because I thought,
It's been 300 spins and they have to come up..

Well 1000 spins later, and $100 lost,
the COLD numbers still had not come up.

but some of the HOT numbers must have came up 10 times.

randomness is random, and you can't predict it, or pattern it.

There are those of us that liked VGHD precisely because there was an almost total absense of sexualy explict content.

I'm one of them. :)

@Philours
Dans la trentaine de fois où j'ai essayé ce jeu l'*****ée dernière, les cartes "récentes" justement (de 2019 ou 2020 par ex) sont très rarement apparues - d'où ma question. Comme tu dis, j'ai peut-être simplement été malchanceux.

Effectivement, j'ai déjà posé cette question plusieurs fois, et merci d'avoir tenté de m'apporter une réponse. 😊
Pour l'instant nous n'avons que des suppositions, mais aucune réponse claire. Ce n'est pas si évident, puisque même les membres qui ont répondu ont une interprétation différente de cette phrase. Peut-être que cette fois-ci nous aurons une réponse, qui sait... 😉

J'imagine que la personne qui a écrit cette phrase dans le règlement sait à quoi correspondent ces cartes dites "récentes".


Out of 30 or so spins last year, "recent" cards (from 2019 or 2020 for example) showed up very rarely - hence my question. As you said, maybe I was just unlucky.

You're right, I have already asked this question several times, and thank you for trying to answer. 😊
So far we only had guesses, but no clear answer. It isn't so obvious after all, since even the members who answered have a different interpretation of this sentence. Maybe this time we will have an answer, who knows... 😉

I imagine that the person who wrote this sentence in the rules knows which ones are the so-called "recent" cards.

@TallandSlimMan thanks for confirming. 👍

I will remind to all that Totem did publish the list of best selling cards of 2020: out of 20 best sellers, vaste majority has been XXX - and moreover, almost all first placed ones have been XXX.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46902/1?post=698311

XXX is here to stay...

Very well deserved!
She's so beautiful and skilled like a succubus that sucks you dry while she ***** you with her gorgeous eyes!

Almost five years now! I am still new here.

The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

That may be true, and quite probably is, but it is not necessarily so. There are those of us that liked VGHD precisely because there was an almost total absense of sexualy explict content.

Yes...well. I haven't played this particular game, but I have played past games with this exact same language.

My post from April of this year:

"The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago."

There are 458 cards I do not own which were released in 2019, 2020. or 2021. These are the ones I would consider "most recent". I tried a test spin. The four cards offered were released in 2013 (!!!) 2015 (!!!) 2017 (!!!) and 2021.

iStripper is great just because it has all.
Here we can see sexy dance, nude dance, tease, stripping and yes, masturbation too. Why not?
The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

By the way, most XXX cards contain 2/3 up to 4/5 of softcore clips...

So well deserved and couldn't be happier to see this! For much of the time the last few weeks, my istripper has become a Paola-Hard-machine, she has something 100% enticing for me and glad to see it recognized in that. Looking forward to many more shows, Paola!

If you want to see girls masturbating you have tons of options. If you want to see most of the XXX girls on this app masturbating, you can find them on many other sites. This kind of soft-core content is unique and is what made the brand what it is. Is that what Istripper is doing now? Catering to people like you who don't even like the product?

👍

Without XXX cards i would probably stop buying their product because not interested on dancing shows.
There are multiple sites for non XXX shows for people interested in that kind of soft-core.

Are you kidding me? If you want to see girls masturbating you have tons of options. If you want to see most of the XXX girls on this app masturbating, you can find them on many other sites. This kind of soft-core content is unique and is what made the brand what it is. Is that what Istripper is doing now? Catering to people like you who don't even like the product?

I'm not against them releasing 1 or 2 XXX cards a week, but for them to release more XXX than stripping shows or even a 50/50 split is kind of ridiculous to me. There are some models who only have XXX shows now. I really like Sasha Meow and was excited to see that she shaved her bush. But every single one of her new cards are XXX? WTF is that?

#05 and climbing. Old timers are slacking on the SEC's it seems :D

So true ...😆

Most Deserving, She is Great in VR.😜😍

Well deserved I'm totally convinced about that ! - Most of all I guess Paola is basically that kind of Model that really loves to share her Erotics with good Peoples ( Men and Women) and Fans - Peoples and Fans who love her Erotics in a Heartful good and kind way and it is an Art as well. When an Erotic Model does a Show etc. she should think only at all good Peoples with Love in their Heart in the Ordiance and not "at the other" Peoples. Love, Life, Freedom, Art and Fantasy and Understanding must win in the End and that's all ! 💙👍👍💖👍

Congratulations Paola !!! and eagerly awaiting your next show.😘❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

@arise
Salut, peut-être , juste pas de chance dans le tirage des cartes qui te sont proposées😉
Ce n'est pas la première fois que tu t'étonnes à ce sujet 😊Je comprend bien ton exemple des personnes de + de 50 ans.
Les réponses que tu as reçues sont valables , bien sûr.
Je ne suis ni Celine, ni Manue, mais si tu comprends, comme moi, que les cartes les plus récentes sont toutes les cartes sauf la collection classique, alors la solution est trouvée 😀😀😀
@arise
Hi, maybe, just bad luck in the draw of the cards that are offered to you😉
This is not the first time that you are surprised about this 😊I understand your example of people over 50 years old.
The answers you received are valid, of course.
I'm neither Celine nor Manue, but if you understand, like me, that the most recent cards are all cards except the classic collection, then the solution is found 😀😀😀

Not Sonya, Freya or Tatiana ?

@wesley077 - their time will come.

If you look at the following link you will see, in the first post from @celine, the criteria on which the winner is selected.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46541/1?post=693470

Number of sales is a primary factor and hence Paola with more shows in her catalogue released or available last month and selling strongly will probably be ahead of the others.

@arise77
"among" veut dire "parmi" et pas "seulement" (mais ça tu le sais déjà). Donc quand @celine écrit "parmi les plus récentes" cela ne signifie pas "seulement parmi les plus récentes". La nuance est bien là, on peut recevoir des cartes récentes (sorties il y a 30 jours ou plus), mais pas que.
Bonne journée quand même 😎

@stefnev1
Justement, "parmi" est suivi d'un groupe défini, indiquant une limite. Par exemple, si je dis "parmi les personnes de plus de 50 ans" cela n'inclut que les personnes de 50 ans et +, mais cela exclut aussi les personnes de moins de 50 ans, logiquement. Donc ce qui ne fait pas partie du groupe énoncé après "parmi" est exclu.
Je pense que ce que tu voulais dire était : "cartes récentes incluses parmi toutes les collections"
Bonne journée également 😉

@Members
You have to read the Entire rule, not just half of it.

The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago.
Most recent not in your Collection and more than 30 days old

Then why say "among the most recent ones"?
For every Member, Most Recent NOT in your collection will be different.

A member who has every Card from 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and none from 2017
Most recent will be cards starting from 2017

For a member who doesn't have cards from 2020
Most recent will be cards starting from 2020

So it depends on a members collection and which cards will be most recent to them.

@Wyldanimal
Thanks for your reply, for me the part "more than 30 days ago" is very clear. My question was about the meaning of "most recent".

So you're saying that if cards from 2020 onwards are available for me to buy, they should be drawn. At the time of my screenshot I had over 300 cards available in the store from 2019 and 2020 even excluding the previous 30 days ones. Why aren't any of these selected then?

💋💋💋🔥🔥❤️❤️

@Members
You have to read the Entire rule, not just half of it.

The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago.

Most recent not in your Collection and more than 30 days old

Then why say "among the most recent ones"?

For every Member, Most Recent NOT in your collection will be different.

A member who has every Card from 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and none from 2017
Most recent will be cards starting from 2017

For a member who doesn't have cards from 2020
Most recent will be cards starting from 2020

So it depends on a members collection and which cards will be most recent to them.

Mérité

@arise77
"among" veut dire "parmi" et pas "seulement" (mais ça tu le sais déjà). Donc quand @celine écrit "parmi les plus récentes" cela ne signifie pas "seulement parmi les plus récentes". La nuance est bien là, on peut recevoir des cartes récentes (sorties il y a 30 jours ou plus), mais pas que.
Bonne journée quand même 😎

@stefnev1
Thanks for your reply, I also assume cards are from the entire collection.
Then why say "among the most recent ones"?

Congrats Paola, very well deserved 😎😍👍

quelle déception !

So far, Paola's outfits are on point. I think both Paola and the staff have a good sense of eye-catching outfits.

@arise77
For me, the cards are selected from 30 days ago and earlier in the entire series you haven't, not only "the most recent". This rule applies (sometimes 45 days ago and earlier) for long time in my knowledge of the games.

I haven't played since last year so I don't know if anything has changed since. I probably tried about 30 spins altogether and never landed on the -70% nor the "free" section of the wheel.

Also in the cards that were drawn, none of them were actually recent; so I still don't understand Celine's post when she says cards are selected "among the most recent cards".
For example, the 4 cards on the screenshot are from 2016 (2), 2013 & 2014.

@Celine @Manue Could you please clarify from which point/date/year cards are considered "the most recent"? And therefore which ones are not recent? Thanks.

❤️❤️❤️💋💋💋💋💋💋🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Not Sonya, Freya or Tatiana ?

Well deserved for the beautiful Paola Hard 💋💋

Definitely worth it and I can't wait for her incoming shows with themed-outfits :0

Paola Hard is a 20-year-old spanish beauty, she started her career in adult modeling in 2020 and hasn't stopped touring since.

One of the things that most marked the team is her ability to adapt to all situations and all requests ...

Pornstar for other productions, she is at iStripper a goddess of seduction and sensuality ... She poses wonderfully and her youth probalby contributes to her freshness and enthusiasm.

She can just as easily embody an exuberant school girl as a femme fatale, a dominant SM, a fierce bride or a daring pastry chef ... and you are not at the end of your surprises with the 5 shows not released yet...:)

If we had to blame her for something, it would be her impatience :) She can't keep still and is always eager to put on a show :)

We are extremely happy to name Paola Hard our iStripper of the Month of August 2021.

Here is an overview of her shows, just for our eyes' pleasure :



And don't forget her absolutely STUNNING VR180 performances:

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/ddce85087c8b8e61
https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/f992e87fa1ea9dec

Congratulations, Paola !! Looking forward to seeing you again 😍

Right @duras, thanks a bunch!

Here you are - it's Morgane from years ago - she made 9 shows in 2008/9
For while I thought looked like Chiara - she also made six shows back in 2008
Both just 19/20 years old back then - Chiara still active it seems, Morgane retired in 2012.
---
Well done @duras 👍 - my thought about Chiara held me up - they could almost be sisters 😄

Yes, it's Morgane, one of the best models ever.

Anyone know who is this? Saw her in another post on this forum but have no idea if she is on iStripper.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29408/65?post=719909
Update added FG117A
re-download required..
https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden117.zip
zip size 14.0 Kb
@WA @EricTotem et al
@TheEmu following your comments about animations above, & in
a quest to restore a better frame rate for the model, we made
experiments further with FG117 calling it FG117A

• eliminated animations of the clipsprite and camera,
• made common the resolutions of camera, quad & clipsprite, .. then
• reverted the Sandbox735004Mod01 shader to its 'original' GLSLSandbox e#73500.4 speed via

#define time u_Elapsed*(-1.0)

This looks to have corrected the stilted movements of the model, seen in the first shader mod version.

I did also try a few spins and made a comment on another thread, but at only 1 credit per spin it will take a very, very long time to fill the bar, unless you do also buy some of the selections. I'm waiting for the scratch card game next week to start my progress.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/48230/1?post=720589

I don’t know how the chances are this time, but from 10 draws I never really got any seriously better discount than 20 percent (most of them were 10%), and all of them mostly ugly cards I didn’t like (maybe would have taken them with MUCH better discounts, or maybe I should have bought some of them to get better discounts). Kind of honestly de-motivates me. Last times (someone might remember that I praised this promotion some time ago) were definitely better :( I mean, even the Slot Machine recently at least showed me 25% every 3rd try or so, or I even got my credits back. Guess I’ll stick to buying new numbers I’m interested in or waiting for the rare cashback offers, obviously the only true interesting promotions meanwhile.

Maya Grand in July 2015 was apparently the Iron Lady - looking lovely in her strapless dress.

I'm at 4636. Getting there...

@cxsn , @HansSachs , me and others just want to know the reason why no previews for SECs on the app - that's all. Not interested at all in the chat about testing - should start a new thread for that if there is more to say.

Dans mon premier post, j'ai juste relater que sur la fin 2018, les SECs arrivaient sur le carroussel et que l'on pouvait uniquement y télécharger les démos. Et que dans la foulée (quelques jours peut-être) il y avait à faire une mise à jour du logiciel recommandée par iStripper. Et qu'à la suite de cette mise à niveau de l'application PLUS DE PREVIEW DE SEC!!! Le spectacle était terminé.

Entre nous:
On se fiche totalement des phases de développement du logiciel, ils ont juste adapté leur code pour que ce dernier bloque les SECs au niveau du carroussel et des previews, pointbarre. Et la génèse de tout ceci est purement commerciale.

P.S.
Perso, je repecte le business privé d'iStripper avec ses règles de fonctionnement, mais ici bloquer des previews, je trouve cela "PAS BIEN DU TOUT".😆

In my first post, I just related that on the end of 2018, the SECs were arriving on the carousel and that you could only download the demos there. And that in the wake (a few days maybe) there was to be a software update recommended by iStripper. And that following this upgrade of the application NO MORE SEC PREVIEW!!! The show was over.

Just between us:
Who cares about the development phases of the software, they just adapted their code to make it block SECs at the carousel and preview level, full stop. And the genesis of all this is purely commercial.

P.S.
Personally, I respect iStripper's private business with its rules of operation, but here blocking previews, I find it "NOT GOOD AT ALL".😆