💋🔥💋💖😘😍👌👍

I remember that announcement and then downloaded her cards I previously bought.

Her shows were removed by her request. There was an announcement ages ago letting people know beforehand.

What happend with the xxx-show of ***** O Fee?

Darcia Lee <3

Since there are no nurses from The Netherlands on iStripper the nearest nurse I can get is the most lovely Ulysse from Bruxelles/Belgium, our neighbour country. Her show has the title "Nurse On Duty". That's what I need; nothing better possible!

We're getting closer and closer to perfection in sensualism with Agatha and her golden little toy 😍

Here is the video : https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/6e943495a13874f4

and Premium members: don't forget that your 20% discount applies to VR videos as well :)

Enjoy!

Vinna Reed and Keana Moire (no garter belts in the costume - important criterium!)

Not possible to transfer credits between accounts.

hi how can i share my credit to another account

And Nurse Selene just kept me in the "Slow Recovery" group till I was about to go crazy!

And Nurse Lucy Li said I'd be getting "Special Care" but then it seemed to be all about her!
I never figured out why she couldn't find a uniform that fit her better -- but then decided that this one fit her just... fine...

Nurse Niemira kept insisting it was "Doctors Orders" but she just made my condition worse, she made it harder and harder for me!

Lies and falsehoods!
Lies and falsehoods!
Nurse Misa and Nurse Eufrat did NOT drive us to "uncontrolable sexual frenzy"! -- we went there "willingly" on our own accord (well, sort of...)!
And I did not have an affair with Nurse Henessey! I swear she kept things tightly and completely in hand when it came to her treament of patients and helped me get a firm grip on myself with her treatments!

If Belka's VR show is anything to go by she'll have a nurse outfit card coming up.

Hopefully Violette will get this strange rash from Nikita under control ... 😲

Whos your fav nurse ?

For many years it was Babs Windsor

Whos your fav nurse ?

You posted a Picture from them already 😍

Stella Cox 😍 🔥

@TheEmu
Well, thanks for the additional explanation.
Perhaps I am just ***** up on the word "camera", expecting negative x to move "camera" to the left, when it is actally the "scene" which moves.
I can live with it I suppose! One has to.

As in Thank God Tomorrow's Friday.

I wonder who our three new girls will be and whether we are going to get a new competition / special offer?

We must be getting closer to seeing the new Belka card and then there's the mouthwatering prospect of the XXX card from Elis.

😀

Yeh, i see there are cases where the 3d camera is useful but for the vast majority of scenes (flat background with some girls overlayed) we see on here the 2d camera is fine. The 3d cam just seems to ***** people.

I feel better allready ! Whos your fav nurse ?

it would be easier to list the ones i dont prefer 😉

@commanderTOTS
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44280/1?post=654442

i guess the search tool was too complicated 😕

try searching for ... iStripper live

@SetFuego ... maybe they are talking about your dog then 😊

@duras, I must admit that Isabelle looks really gorgeous. I have only one her card for now, but I’m sure I’ll buy all. What an incredible woman…

They are webcams. you choose a girl, purchase a lot of credits (1000+) for maybe an hour. Put in an offer with the girl... the button is at the top of the video area.

At this point you're spending cash like it's going out of fashion, but the girls on there are pretty flexible and will do what you require. You should hang around and get to know the girl before you make an offer, not every show is a perfect match of what you want and what she is willing to do.

Every so often she will offer a private party. A number of people will group together for a show and they can be quite explicit!

could someone explain to me how private shows work on Istripper live and how much it costs.

@bobby2020 Hi, please provide all the details to [email protected] Thank you

@Z22 - I don't think that it is using the Z buffer even for a 3D camera, or if it is it is not using it in a way that is correlated to 3D space. Even in 3D scenes it just "slaps down" the scene elements in script order without taking any notice of their Z co-ordinates You can see this very easily by giving the "front" layer a Z co-ordinate that is further way from the camera than a "back" layer, or by defining two sprites that are angled such as to intersect each other in which case you will see all of the front sprite even though half of it has a Z co-ordinate that is further away from the camera than the sprite that it intersects.

The 3D camera not olny helps with parallax but also with getting perspective right which is important if you are moving things about in a scene (such as with my carousels), or are zooming in or out by animating the camera's angle of view (effectively changing its focal length) rather than moving it in and out, or want something to be at an angle to the view direction (such as the shadow of a performer on the floor she is dancing on)

@TheEMU yeh, i can see the point with making paralax easy to do but for scenes that don't it just seems to ***** more people.

Is it still using the zbuffer when using the 2d camera? I thought it just slapped them down in script order to the back buffer overwriting anything that was there from previous (in the current frame) sprites. So it draws the entire background then overwrites it with a girl or some such?

My Four New Models,

Lesya, Randy Ayn, Belka, Jessika.

Hello,

Thanks for the encouragement.

You are correct, number 2 is in transition.

Bob

I hear that every day when I take a dog for walkies. 😆

LOL @willyweekly

I was running today (allowed even during a shelter in place because I was alone)

A woman called out to me "woo hoo, nice legs!"

I'm not a dancer, but I am a member....

Does that count?

From the "new" girls i really like the two canadian models Isabelle and Jessika. They are really beautiful and sexy with great dancing skills. I was unable to find them anywhere else on the internet, great job from the Totem team to find those two gems. Hopefully they will be back in the future from for some more cards.

Thanks Rex but...I have like 23 models in the last month sitting in the cue do to no preview peek. I'm back to no peek no buy due to the fact I can't win anything for the games. Can we please start getting some nice peek previews?

Thanks, very much, @Rex

I bought a ton of credits on your February 29th promotion. Bad timing on my part, I guess, but at least I'm supporting Totem. It's nice to have some continuity as I'm hunkered down in my home in the U.S.

Thanks, again, for your reassuring note.

@bobby2020

As @gkar45 said a card is released each day (well its 7 per week with one per day from monday to thursday and three on friday). These are then available for you to purchase using any credits that you have in your account.

Most new cards cost 25 credits each, so for 50 credits you can buy two. (It gets cheaper when you have a bigger collection).

If you want more you have to first buy more credits (for real money) and then use those credits to buy any cards that you want.

iStripper does not work on the principle of a single subscription gives you access to everything, you have to buy each card seperately.

I am fed up with your system. Either you fix my acount: 2 cardsin my collection. You are supposed to down load a new card every day, I have nothing. I paid for 50 credits, I don't have any.
If you don't fixe my account then refund me the $59.00 I paid.

Edit by mod : personal infos are not allowed in the forum, I've deleted them. Please log a ticket to the customer service to explain your problem.

Well, sincere apologies for getting carried away with my earlier posts in this thread, for insulting people for their tastes.

It's funny how one (read: me) can get over protective of the girls performing here (or potentially performing here in the future) 😐

To me the sexiest XXX-shows are those where the girl genuinely, honestly enjoys what she's doing, is performing in her comfort zone, and ideally is even getting excited and turned on during that performance. I don't think that the most extreme XXX-content will do that to them... it seems ***** and ***** (based on just my assumption, of course)

That's my opinion, reflecting my wish for what content iStripper should have, and not have, in the future. I should certainly have found a more adult and less ***** influenced way to voice all that...

Glad for this information.

I am also here to support the community. If you need a location to have models in California, I will gladly open my house!!! Send them over anytime!!!

(One at a time please, I am getting old)

@Z22

I use the 3D camera for two reasons

1) It automatically resizes clips (and other scene elements) that I want to appear to be at different distances from the camera making it easier to produce a scene that features girls at different distances. This only works if you have first matched the camera position, distance and view angle to the background and foreground elements, but if you do that then the result is well worth it - especially if you are moving clips about in the scene.

2) If you have scene with separate foreground, background and various middle ground elements then moving the camera (or zooming it by changing it angle of view) will cause these to apparently move relative to each other - i.e. there will be a visible parallax effect - which can greatly enhance the feeling of a there being a 3D scene even though it is just a set of 2D flats at different distances from the camera.

Note, there is little or no difference in efficiency in using a 2D or 3D scenes. In both cases there is a final stage that reduced to a mutlipliction of a matrix by a vector to do the projection onto the 2D surface of the screen. The difference being that in the 2D case the matrixand vector have some zeros in them that are not there in the 3D case. Furthermore, this projection matrix muliplication should, in any reasonable system have been combined with the other matrix multiplications required for scaling and rotations so it is essentlially free.

I didn't agree too much with this choice, but the last card of Ellie Undisclosed Desire e1325 was great. I wrote this in my comment:
I wasn’t too impressed by Ellie’s dancing in the two cards I had already (e1324 and f0590). When I watched the previews of this card (e1325), I saw a totally new Ellie and I knew I had to buy this show. No artistic gimmicks or nothing-happening-slowness, but real, spontaneous and well paced dancing, a total surprise! Not only real dancing, but also superb playing with the dress like in clip #20.
Indeed: Ellie can play many roles and now I can agree with her being Talent of the Month.

Why do people bother with the 3d camera anyway? You can do all the moving left/ right/ up/ down in the 2d camera. It's just zoming thats more difficult but can still be done in other ways, rotation distorts the girls so is pointless. I have never found an actual use for the 3d camera, it's not like we are using 3d models.

@DrDoom9. I was about to add the following piece of Ascii art that illustrates the point

If we have a scene comprising a row of 9 objects and a camera looking at the centre of that row this looks like

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
........V........ Camera

where I have used a V for the camera because it looks like a field of view

If we increase the camera position (and its target) by +4 units this becomes

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
............V.... Camera

(If we did not increase the camera's target at the same time as increasing its position then the camera would end up oposite scene object 7 but pointing somewhat backwards towards object 5. How big that camera rotation would be depends on just where the target was placed, if it was exactly at item 5 then the camera would rotate to exactly ponit at it, if it was a long way behind item 5 then the rotation would be much smaller)

If instead we increase the position of everything else by +4, which is what happens if we nest everything in the scene other than the camera into a single node and change its position by 4. we get

....1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
........V........ Camera

(If we move the scene there is no need to compensate using the target position)

I have never tried it, but I suppose you could nest everything including the camera into a node and move it by 4 units in which case you would get

....1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
............V........ Camera

but that would not be very useful.

@TheEmu
Quite!
Yes, indeed!

But, to me, it is most unintuitive!
In real life, if I point my camera at a lamp post then move 100 yards left holding the camera in a fixed position relative to my body, the camera will point at the next lam post, to the left of the first, further back along the road.

But rather than move the camera to the left by 100 yards how far, and in which direction, would you have to move the road and its lamp posts to get the same effect.