Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.
0
Subjectivity as opposed to objectivity Forum / Tutto su iStripper
July 24, 2021
A recent discussion has cropped up in the Bugs and Fixes thread relating to whether certain tags should be strictly objective (i.e. yes or no) or whether they should reflect degrees of subjectivity (i.e. a tag is only set if the presence of that factor exceeds a certain level).
Please use this thread if you want to discuss this - and leave the Bugs And Fixes thread for actual bugs and fixes.
Please use this thread if you want to discuss this - and leave the Bugs And Fixes thread for actual bugs and fixes.
July 24, 2021
Some example posts extracted from the Bugs and Fixes thread;
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/36?post=719794
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/36?post=719799
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/36?post=719811
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/36?post=719816
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/37?post=719817
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/37?post=719821
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/37?post=719822
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/37?post=719824
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/20598/37?post=719825
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
TheEmu
Da In Jul 2012 3309 post(s)
July 24, 2021 (edited)
Several tags can be used to sort one way or the other, it's obvious
I mentioned it because the suggestion that the meaning of "bare feet" should be changed would adversely affect those that use it as a warning - i.e. the original poster had not seem to consider this use as obvious.
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
July 25, 2021
For me the "small tits" tag simply means 'small for frame of model' and not say, 'anything more than a handful is a waste' 😊 😋 😄 So then "big boobs" would for me at least mean 'large for frame of model'. So such things are proportional and still useful for preferences. Hope that makes some sense.
Philours
Da In Feb 2019 1659 post(s)
July 25, 2021
Oui , oui ça a du sens, heu oui, mais je préfère tout de même m'en assurer par moi-même avec les aperçus, par exemple. Ou si vous connaissez le modèle, vous savez ce que vous verrez 😊
Je veux bien admettre cependant qu'une telle balise peut être utile pour l'application d'une scène ou pour un premier "tri" à condition que les cartes soient toutes analysées😉
Yeah, yeah that makes sense, uh yeah, but I still prefer to make sure on my own with previews, for example. Or if you know the model, you know what you will see
I am willing to admit however that such a tag can be useful for the application of a scene or for a first "sorting" provided that the cards are all analyzed😉
Je veux bien admettre cependant qu'une telle balise peut être utile pour l'application d'une scène ou pour un premier "tri" à condition que les cartes soient toutes analysées
Yeah, yeah that makes sense, uh yeah, but I still prefer to make sure on my own with previews, for example. Or if you know the model, you know what you will see
I am willing to admit however that such a tag can be useful for the application of a scene or for a first "sorting" provided that the cards are all analyzed
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
July 26, 2021
Always use you own eyes. For a whole lot of analyzing. Eye candy needs tasting. 😄 But that takes time and so tags that might narrow the search for whatever a new member may want demands some system however general. With so many models where does one start? 😕 The tags I tried when I started didn't get me very far. So yeah. Previews if they work. Some medium and I think standard quality previews jam up on me. I had to go by the pics and comments not knowing anything about the models.
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021
The idea of "casual" is that it represents an everyday outfit that the girl could wear in a public place - hence shorts and a top, jeans, a summer dress.
So it excludes formal wear (like secretarial) and bikinis and the like.
@pickle1
Yes, but it is a bit loose. Example being f0821 Sasha Meow / Night Date
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021
And of course the rare bathrobe seems to get the 'casual' tag like f0836 Milena Ray / Freshly Showered. I approve of this recent tag. 👍 😎
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021
Yeah, I would apply "casual" for everyday street clothes like shorts or pants. I don't know how I would tag bathrobes being so rare and all. 😕
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021
No problem 😎
Philours
Da In Feb 2019 1659 post(s)
October 3, 2021
Ellie Leen/Under My Shorts 0592 étiquetée casual. Elle pourrait donc porter cette tenue dans un lieu public et pas son bikini? Je dois admettre que j'ai du mal a comprendre, mais bon 😊
Ellie Leen / Under My Shorts 0592 labeled casual. So she could wear this outfit in a public place and not her bikini? I have to admit that I have a hard time understanding it, but hey😊
Ellie Leen / Under My Shorts 0592 labeled casual. So she could wear this outfit in a public place and not her bikini? I have to admit that I have a hard time understanding it, but hey
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021 (edited)
Certains d'entre eux sont un peu exagérés mais assez proches pour moi.
😄 Some of these are a stretch but close enough for me. 😊
Philours
Da In Feb 2019 1659 post(s)
October 3, 2021
C'est donc le défaut de ces balises trop généralistes, il faut des balises plus précises. Vous pouvez continuer avec la balise casual et ensuite vous pourrez passer a la balise costume et vous verrez que beaucoup de cartes peuvent être étiquetées de la sorte (beaucoup trop, en fait) Bon amusement 😉 😊
This is therefore the fault of these overly generalist markers, more precise markers are needed. You can continue with the casual tag and then you can switch to the costume tag and you will see that a lot of cards can be labeled that way (way too many, actually) Good fun😉 😊
This is therefore the fault of these overly generalist markers, more precise markers are needed. You can continue with the casual tag and then you can switch to the costume tag and you will see that a lot of cards can be labeled that way (way too many, actually) Good fun
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 3, 2021
Peut-être. C'est pourquoi je n'inclurais pas "robe" ou "jupe" dans l'étiquette "casual".
Maybe. That's why I wouldn't include "dress" or "skirts" in the "casual" tag.
😊 😎
Maybe. That's why I wouldn't include "dress" or "skirts" in the "casual" tag.
Philours
Da In Feb 2019 1659 post(s)
October 4, 2021
@Socialhazard
La balise "robe" et la balise "jupette" existent. Vous pouvez les insérer dans ces catégories plus précises😉
The "dress" tag and the "skirt" tag exist. You can insert them in these more precise categories😉
La balise "robe" et la balise "jupette" existent. Vous pouvez les insérer dans ces catégories plus précises
The "dress" tag and the "skirt" tag exist. You can insert them in these more precise categories
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 4, 2021
Exactement . 👍
Exactly.👍
Exactly.
Philours
Da In Feb 2019 1659 post(s)
October 4, 2021
Pour terminer, nous savons comment les balises sont attribuées et nous connaissons le mode de fonctionnement. Il faut penser aux nouveaux membres qui feraient une recherche sur le site afin que cela leur paraissent correct et utile 😊
Finally, we know how the tags are assigned and we know how it works. You have to think about new members who would do a search on the site so that it appears correct and useful to them😊
Finally, we know how the tags are assigned and we know how it works. You have to think about new members who would do a search on the site so that it appears correct and useful to them
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 4, 2021
e1641 Eden Venua a à la fois "casual" et "skirts" alors que je l'aurais laissé avec "skirts" et les autres tags qu'il possède. Pour moi, le tag "casual" devrait être plus différencié et être un short ou un pantalon et un haut d'une certaine sorte. Bien que toujours un strech si certaines de ces tenues seraient portées en public comme tenue de tous les jours. 😕 😄
e1641 Eden Venua has Both "casual" and "skirts" while I would have left it with the "skirts" and the other tags it has. For me the "casual" tag should be more differetiated and be shorts or pants and a top of some kind. Though still a strech if some of these outfits would be worn in public as everyday attire.😕 😄
e1641 Eden Venua has Both "casual" and "skirts" while I would have left it with the "skirts" and the other tags it has. For me the "casual" tag should be more differetiated and be shorts or pants and a top of some kind. Though still a strech if some of these outfits would be worn in public as everyday attire.
Socialhazard
Da In Nov 2020 1159 post(s)
October 4, 2021 (edited)
@Philours
Aussi. Je ne sais pas vraiment comment ils attribuent les étiquettes. Je me contente de parcourir ce qu'ils ont classé comme X et d'essayer d'en trouver d'autres qui devraient avoir X dans les catégories qui semblent avoir trop peu de résultats en raison de mes expériences lorsque j'étais un nouveau membre et de ce que les nouveaux membres ont demandé dans un passé récent.
Je m'excuse pour le traducteur car je sais que les tags ne sont pas tous en français, je pense que vous l'avez déjà mentionné.
Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite)Also. I don't really know how they assign tags. I just go through what they have taged as X and try to find others that should have X in categories that seem to have too few results because of my experiences when I was a new member and what new members have asked for in the recent past.
Apologies for the translator as I know the tags are not all in French I think you mentioned before.
Aussi. Je ne sais pas vraiment comment ils attribuent les étiquettes. Je me contente de parcourir ce qu'ils ont classé comme X et d'essayer d'en trouver d'autres qui devraient avoir X dans les catégories qui semblent avoir trop peu de résultats en raison de mes expériences lorsque j'étais un nouveau membre et de ce que les nouveaux membres ont demandé dans un passé récent.
Je m'excuse pour le traducteur car je sais que les tags ne sont pas tous en français, je pense que vous l'avez déjà mentionné.
Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite)
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/48459/1?post=724397
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/45979/10?post=725504
Non sei autorizzato a visualizzare questo argomento o ad accedere ai dati relativi a questo argomento
Apologies for the translator as I know the tags are not all in French I think you mentioned before.
Non sei ancora autorizzato a partecipare
Come utente gratuito iStripper, non ti è consentito rispondere a un argomento nel forum o creare un nuovo argomento
Ma potrai accedere alle categorie e ai concetti di base ed entrare in contatto con la nostra comunità.!