@ParrotEx that description would describe about 97% of the girls/wimen/models on iStripper & more than that depending on your idea of perky

Ok, maybe I wrote too general.. i mean shows with girls, who have sort of pointy, puffy tits.. example Mischa (Iveta C) . Or something like Retrousse Tits.

I have just had reason to look at my vghd.log file. I see the following error recorded which I believe relates to this card and maybe to the giantess problem

2020-05-21T11:47:34 cards: [CardImageCache::processImageRequest] WARNING[QUrl( "https://www.istripper.com/free/sets/e1411/illustrations/e1411_fullhd.png" ) "Expected CRC was 3925379687 instead of 2546701702"]

The giantess on the releases carousel problem is something that has happened a few times in the past, but this is the first time that I can remember it persisting long after it first being reported. Possibly this is the first time since switching to the cloud based servers and the correction has not properly replicated itself throughout the cloud - I think we have seen this with a few other problem fixes since the switch.

'The Attack of the 50foot (15.24 meter ) Stripper!'

Silvia Luca, Ava, Belle Claire, Heidi Romanova, Stacy Cruz, Agatha Vega, Scyley Jam,

Any show from Avery and Nancy A.

But there are a lot more :)

Whoever recommends a show with nice perky boobs?

Just one? 😱
I don't know... Jenni Gregg or Jana Cova

Little Caprice, Melisa Mendiny.
Btw, does anyone know why popular models who were starting out in the 2000s, like the above two, are not invited back to do more shoots?

I'm sure Melisa was invited back in recent years. I don't know about the others

Talia Mint impressed me as well, @zz. Great performance very fit body.🔥

Talia Mint made a great debut yesterday dancing on the PepperMINT twist: the best Pole specialist since recently Angelika Grays and Anastasia Brokelyn (Talent of the Month May 2020). Great show!

Little Caprice, Melisa Mendiny.
Btw, does anyone know why popular models who were starting out in the 2000s, like the above two, are not invited back to do more shoots?

Thanks for the pro tips Emu, it's working much better for me, and I'm discovering the use of fullscreen mode and the quality is noticable, thank you so much.

Jana Cova, Vicky S,, or Aleska Diamond

The good new is....

the babes get naked!!!

@desexyvideoclub,
If you are sharing iStripper with another person even if that is family, the you are actually in breach of the Licence that you agreed to when you signed up to Totem:

The limited license granted to you in Section I is subject to the additional limitations set forth below in this Section III. Any use of the Software in ***** of the license limitations set forth below is an unauthorised use of the Software outside of the license granted to you in Section I, and will be regarded as an infringement of the copyrights Totem Entertainment holds in and to the Software and the Product. You agree that you will not, under any circumstances:
Sell, lease, rent, loan or otherwise transfer the Software, or grant a security interest in or transfer reproductions of the Software or the Product, to a third party;

While I am aware of similar circumstances in the past, its never wise to flout you "indiscretion", Totem does have the right to disable your account for this.

I would have preferred to see 1 or 2 XXX cards in Nici's third set...
Anyway, this doesn't matter now. If a good job has been done, her new card with that outfit will be absolutly unbelievable 😍

I know some are disappointed by no xxx cards, but not me. Nici is the most beautiful woman on earth. I can't wait for this card😍

Live Jasmin used years ago. Untilll my bank account was protesting. Great shows but can be expensive. Just an advice, only charge what you can afford and remove creditcard after you charged credits. It was easy to buy credits after credits. Still great time.

I love this....

Maybe it could be a new setting.

Every time a wishlist appears... it is giant!!!!

I don't think she's dangerous though 😆

Totem offers approximately 4520 cards....There are 14 SE cards. 9/14 cards are from girls who have 12 or more shows. So we are ***** about 0.3% of cards, where 70% of these 0.3% are from girls with huge collections available. And none of them are considered truly special...one has roller skates, another has a shopping bag, a few are seasonal. The real "problem" is the fact that people aren't willing to go without 0.3% of a collection without paying exhorbinant prices...is it ego or just an addiction.

Even weirder...a person with 4520 cards...lets say they watch 8 hours of cards a day, every day, it would take 420 days to watch their collection. So we have people collecting who might never watch a card, or only watch it once, who are spending massive amounts of money. Something isn't right.

@Vortim, the problem there is that there are some users that have bought every card so they have a huge sunk cost fallacy/***** of missing out. So they will pay ridiculous amounts to keep their full collection (though some have said f it and said they won't buy any more credits).

Proveing my point as to why they will never go away and never be for sale.... Is it really a "problem" in Totems eyes? Nope....

@Opie235

The the cards produced before Crystal Clear used a lower resolution camera than those produced since so the original image quality Totem are working with will be lower for the earlier cards. This will be particularly noticeable if you allow the cards to be scaled beyond their native resolution (controlled by the "Do not zoom of 100% of the clips original size" tick box on the settings page). However, if you do restrict the scalling to not exceed 100% then the height of the affected cards will be limited so they won't fit your screen as well as you might like.

The photo's are made with a much higher resolution still camera so their image quality is not related to that of the clips.

Unfortunately until now the scaling algorithm used for the desktop mode is a relatively poor, but quick, one.

In fullscreen scene mode things are somewhat better as in that mode a better scaling algorithm seems to be used (one that takes advantage of your GPU). It is to be hoped that Totem will, perhaps optionally, use a better scalling algorithm for the dektop mode in some futre release.

I'm looking at 1312 Little Caprice, from 2013. I'm a fan.

The demo quality on my screen that's 3440x1440, is extremely blurry, not enjoyable, and barely viewable.
I see the quality of the photos for this card look much better.

For anyone who owns this card or any card from or before 2013, is the demo quality of these cards the same quality as the full show?

For now I'm just avoiding all the old cards where the demo appears blurry to me, which are cards made before Crystal Clear. Please let me know if the full shows are any different.

Do we need to create a different account for "IStripper Live" or does IStripper automatically log us in?

You need to make a new one. But if you have an account with livejasmin you will most likely be able to use that one.

@Vortim, the problem there is that there are some users that have bought every card so they have a huge sunk cost fallacy/***** of missing out. So they will pay ridiculous amounts to keep their full collection (though some have said f it and said they won't buy any more credits).

It's upsetting that SECs are not even available for purchase when it comes out. It's straight to gambling upon release.

And here we go! Just start y with >0 and nothing is stuck, that's what I meant.. 😊

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vJzsnCVvwpf_GOn2YtzL_Qs8y-boOHLW
if you're interested this is what i messing about with.

ahh. think i see it now. thanks.

it now looks like

float lum = GetLuma(1.0-FB.rgb);

float yd = 5.0 + (5.0 * lum) ;

for ( float y=(1.0); y<=yd; y+=1.0 )
{
float xd = (0.5*y);
for ( float x=(-xd); x<=xd; x+=xd )
{
float x1 = x*2.0;
vec2 p1 = vTexCoord.xy + Offset * vec2(x1, y);

Yes, that is correct. But in your first example, the x-loop cannot work on the first y pass, because

for (float y=(0.0); y<25.01; y+=1.0)
{
float xd = (0.25*y);
float xdm = xd+0.1
for (float x=(-xd); x<xdm; x+=(xd))
{

for (float x=(-0.0); x<0.1; x+=0.0)

The first X-loop with Y=0.0 runs dead because of the step size 0.0.

maybe it should be

for (x=(-1.0), x<=1.0; x+=1.0)

edit... yep, that works as intended and x reached xd.

It behaves like

if (x+1.0 < 1.0 )
{
x =+1.0
}
else
{
break;
}

so..

if (x+1.0 < 1.01 )
{
x =+1.0
}
else
{
break;
}

is needed.

i have to add 0.1 or some value to xd otherwise it drops out early and never actually reaches xd.
if i have

for (x=(-1.0), x<1.0; x+=1.0)

it doesnt reach 1.0 and drops out at 0.0;
whereas

for (x=(-1.0); x<1.01; x+=1.0)

then it works as intended and x reaches 1.0

It's to get the giggles. 😆

Whoa, wicked, I checked it before you edited it...😖

But no matter if 0.25 or 0.26, because the error is in the absolute assignment xdm = xd+0.1. The 2nd x-loop is dead, because it can never reach xdm with 0.1 as content with a step size of 0 (xd=(0.25*0)) in the first loop pass. y is =0 in the first pass.

You earn the admiration, awe, respect, adoration, and envy of all the rest of here -- isn't that enough!

So can we earn stuff with these achievements or is it just for kicks and giggles? 😋

Yeh, i think it's because it's the var in the for loop, so the first pass it's fine but when it gets back to do the next for it has a spaz as the value is lower than the starting x.

Have found something else weird though.

for (float y=(0.0); y<25.01; y+=1.0)
{
float xd = (0.25*y);
float xdm = (0.26*y);
for (float x=(-xd); x<xdm; x+=(xd))
{

works

for (float y=(0.0); y<25.01; y+=1.0)
{
float xd = (0.25*y);
float xdm = xd+0.1;
for (float x=(-xd); x<xdm; x+=(xd))
{

crashes.

I think, in the first case x itself is multiplied by 2.0 in each loop pass, whereas in the second case only x*2.0 is passed to the function vec2.
As a programmer in the last millennium I think...right @z22 ?

nm, i have realised why.

hmm...
this...

for (float y=(0.0); y<5.01; y+=1.0)
{
for (float x=(0.5*-y); x<0.5*y; x+=0.5)
{
x *=2.0;
vec2 p1 = vTexCoord.xy + Offset * vec2(x, y);

crashes istripper but
this ...

for (float y=(0.0); y<5.01; y+=1.0)
{
for (float x=(0.5*-y); x<0.5*y; x+=0.5)
{

vec2 p1 = vTexCoord.xy + Offset * vec2(x*2.0, y);

doesn't

err dafuk? Something with amd's compiler perhaps?

sure...

Ok I've seen the profile and sent a PM. I'm waiting the answer from the OP.

@stefnev1 @Manue
***** [Am.] [sl.] [strongly racially offensive, especially when used by a nonblack person]

I think a simple PM is certainly not helpful there. In these cases, a permanent ban is the minimum. Such a thing cannot be tolerated.

less popular SECs like Olivia Sin's
Olivia Sin's SEC is a very good card. It had poor reviews only because it's a New Year card while people waited for a Xmas card (better not to comment on such a thing...)

I just got the SEC from Olivia Sin the other day and this show confirms me in my decision to give almost nothing to this oh so great scoring system where many people leave their brains off when they give the points. I judge only by my own taste and certainly not by the fact if some fathead just couldn't download the corresponding card, if there was a bugged clip or if the show came for Christmas as a New Year's Eve greeting.

But I will not stop cursing this damned sales tactic with the help of SEC's.

I just did a search.
I typed birthday and there are more than two threads.

It's your birthday

happy birthday

birthday special

and others.

The seach worked, but it was rather more than I expected.

Why do we have 2 birthday threads open ??

Because Search function of Forum doesn't work.

Why do we have 2 birthday threads open ??

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/38023/10?post=645139

and

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29338/1?post=459178

Can we get one of these closed ?? possibly the second one ??

Thanks

Ok I've seen the profile and sent a PM. I'm waiting the answer from the OP.

@stefnev1 - I think it is in response to words used in the OP's profile.

@didgedrum may not realise that the word used there, though considered racist if spoken by a non-black person, it is common parlance in the rap community.

I'm sure no offence was meant.

I have just discovered (sad geek that I am) that JK Rowlings birthday is July 31 1965 and Harry Potter's "official" birthday is July 31 1990.

Anybody want to take any bets that this Anastasiia card gets released on July 31?

By the way - Hermione's birthday is September 19th 1979 so I don't want to have to wait that long...

😆😆😆

I am sooooo looking forward to this card.