What exactly makes you think that "the others" with their penchant for public complaints don't enjoy their girls anyway?
What exactly is this "***** stuff" that in your eyes obviously excludes enjoying others?

It doesn't matter what i'm thinking in personal, then thankfully the thoughts are free.
But when you really want to know what i was thinking when i read your comment?
So here it is, and only for you my Dear 😘 Enjoy it 😉

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

I take it you changed the value in the non working version to match the working one and tested it. Did it work?

Looking forward to this card, Kitana Lure's next cards seems to be an XXX card as well, woohoo! :3
I hope they release back to back. :)

show E0666 and i want it.😈😈😈 do not SEC this show.please.

Okay, an update on the Mystery Envelope game.
+ 600 = 12 Purchases at 50 credits
-- 320 = I won 10 credits 32 times
-- 100 = I won 50 twice = -100 credits
---------
180 = Cost of the Anastasia card. I didn't win anything else.

(Also, since I have all of the cards, I got 60 scratch cards for the 600 credits.)

Melody Powers Kick Boxer has her play kick boxing and warming up with a Jump rope! I agree more of these are needed.

We need a pissed off award....

Maybe a rant and rave award...

(it can show two dancers fighting over a 420 badge)

Haha so perfect. LMAO

Personally I like the badges. They do need to improve updating, but I am hopeful its just a backlog remaining from COVID shutdown. I can only hope the backlog will be cleared sooner than later.

Took me also about 35 scratch cards to get the SEC. Kept on playing to end with a "win".In total 41 scratch cards, down 340 credits. Got 10 unwanted cards (a few of them 720p or 1080p) + the SEC.Won 100 credits twice, 20 cred. 14 times. No other SEC (as usual...).So that's over 30 credits on average per card, or over 200 credits for the SEC, depending on how you see it.Definitely wasn't worth it. On the birght side, I'm losing interest so I won't be losing credits anymore 😜

@arise77 Maybe i cost 440 credits,got 20 cards +SEC.About 10 cards dislike. I'm think that games not interesting.

SE/gambling is easy money for totem... it is like giving a teacher smart students, a police officer a safe community, a soldier a peaceful enlistment...human nature is to soften or become lazy when things are easy especially if working hard doesn't necessarily make you more money. That is the ultimate worry with any easy money. The company will continue to invest in ways to make easy money while drifting away from providing a service. And the teacher becomes lazy, the police officer fat, and the solider untrained. Or it may be that SE/gambling just makes enough to take some pressure off and gives totem some room to take chances and make the product better. I hope the latter. Those that think these sorts of games are just innocent side project haven't paid attention to the gaming industry. The entire industy has been completely changed by loot boxes and games of chance. Entire games are built around the mechanic, meaning they aren't games anymore but mechanisms to get people to gamble. That is my biggest worry with istripper, it slowly becomes an overlay for a gambling program.

@orclover I second that！

So let the others do their ***** Stuff ....

What exactly makes you think that "the others" with their penchant for public complaints don't enjoy their girls anyway?
What exactly is this "***** stuff" that in your eyes obviously excludes enjoying others?

@TallandSlimMan

And some people might forget that we are here to enjoy these Girls.
And also some people never seem to get full, unfortunately.
But anyway, i'm glad that i can enjoy these lovely Girls, so again Thanks to Totem for that.

The crux of the issue is that the product is only sustainable because of people who buy cards they never or rarely watch. If I never buy another card I could watch istripper for 2000 hours...8 hours a day for 10 months and then there are still cards that I could watch infinitly and still "enjoy". I can watch the cards in slow mo, I could record them in fullscreen with filters to make them sharper, I could cut gifs, take stop motion pics, make compilations and photoshop images. The reality is I already have enough product to last for years. In fact my top 500 cards could last me years of enjoyment...yet...I am looking at the upcoming cards, wondering If I will like them, debating whether I should buy today's card...so in order for me to continue to support the company I have to continue to buy even though I have more than enough entertainment. So the entire process kind of feeds off of dissatisfaction or want.

@TallandSlimMan

As for me...there is no single card which I must have. I'll enjoy my thousands of other cards.

Nothing to ***** about this two Sentences 👍 but as usual,
the unsatisfied is always loud and *****, but the Connoisseur is silent.

And some people might forget that we are here to enjoy these Girls.
And also some people never seem to get full, unfortunately.
But anyway, i'm glad that i can enjoy these lovely Girls, so again Thanks to Totem for that.

So let the others do their ***** Stuff ....

@orclover Man, gambling and stripping turn me on!

These scratch games area better deal for those with small collections than for those of us with large collections. Period. Think about that before you play.

Want to have the SEC card? Really...how much is it worth to you? Also consider there will be a future event with an opportunity to buy the card.

As for me...there is no single card which I must have. I'll enjoy my thousands of other cards.

A fresh install of everything 'Hue' made no difference on my rig.

As mentioned a while back, the problem for me is @Z22"s 'Hue.fsh' changes to another version
between Z22_Hue2 and Z22_Hue3 at line 21 (as above).

The 'hue.fsh' new version published in Z22_Hue3 does not compile properly on my rig.
but when I substituted that with the earlier hue.fsh version (right side above) it worked.

Further, substituting (& renaming) the orig hue.fsh in place of hue2.fsh compiled somehow ok for Hue_Glass.scn
but alas, applying this backtrack method with Hue_F3.fsh did not work for Hue_Fire.

Do you know, I'm beginning to wish the achievements had never come online because they seem to be giving rise to undesirable behaviours and anger - and for what - a simple little .jpg!

We have had endless complaints about awards not being received or being too difficult. We have suggestions that people should be disqualified for trying for a fansign if they have won previously. We have frankly ridiculous prices being reached to buy a costume which is nearly pricing genuine collectors out of the market. And we have people prepared to spam both the forum and the review comments with garbage simply to acquire another "badge".

And it's even got me wound up now!

😫😫😫

We need a pissed off award....

Maybe a rant and rave award...

(it can show two dancers fighting over a 420 badge)

@SetFuego that sounds like a very slow *****, and also that really has not achieved anything more but small tweaks to the gaming system and not a total collapse.

And that is exactly what I want to achieve. A constant, small indisposition on the part of those responsible for it. In this profit-oriented business, the big all-round blow is not (no longer) possible anyway, but to show small limits.

This is just my tiny, insignificant opinion (maybe 2ct 😉) that I live by.

SE/gambling is easy money for totem... it is like giving a teacher smart students, a police officer a safe community, a soldier a peaceful enlistment...human nature is to soften or become lazy when things are easy especially if working hard doesn't necessarily make you more money. That is the ultimate worry with any easy money. The company will continue to invest in ways to make easy money while drifting away from providing a service. And the teacher becomes lazy, the police officer fat, and the solider untrained. Or it may be that SE/gambling just makes enough to take some pressure off and gives totem some room to take chances and make the product better. I hope the latter.

Those that think these sorts of games are just innocent side project haven't paid attention to the gaming industry. The entire industy has been completely changed by loot boxes and games of chance. Entire games are built around the mechanic, meaning they aren't games anymore but mechanisms to get people to gamble. That is my biggest worry with istripper, it slowly becomes an overlay for a gambling program.

We have had endless complaints about awards not being received or being too difficult. We have suggestions that people should be disqualified for trying for a fansign if they have won previously. We have frankly ridiculous prices being reached to buy a costume which is nearly pricing genuine collectors out of the market. And we have people prepared to spam both the forum and the review comments with garbage simply to acquire another "badge".

And it's even got me wound up now!

😫😫😫

@pickle1
You're not the only one 😕

@pickle1

We have frankly ridiculous prices being reached to buy a costume which is nearly pricing genuine collectors out of the market.

Peanuts here on iStripper ... more or less.
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/marilyn-monroes-happy-birthday-mr-president-dress-sells-for-4-8-million-113128/

Do you know, I'm beginning to wish the achievements had never come online because they seem to be giving rise to undesirable behaviours and anger - and for what - a simple little .jpg!

We have had endless complaints about awards not being received or being too difficult. We have suggestions that people should be disqualified for trying for a fansign if they have won previously. We have frankly ridiculous prices being reached to buy a costume which is nearly pricing genuine collectors out of the market. And we have people prepared to spam both the forum and the review comments with garbage simply to acquire another "badge".

And it's even got me wound up now!

😫😫😫

@DANO70

From what E.T. said in his posts @Z22 's were not working for him in any version includeing ours.

Thats correct. I have not been able to compile properly the Hue 2+3 ones in any iStripper version . It just comes up as noise with a faint diagonal band of noise bottom left to upper right of the screen. The only scene that works is the one containing the original Hue.fsh
Screencap is from Z22_Hue3
Might be something corrupted in download. All the Metaglass, motion feedback & others work fine
I'll delete all the Hues from /scenes, redownload and extract again. See what eventuates then..

Under Categories click on the "Sport " . Shes a maniac ,... Maniac! , iM SURE TOO KNOW " ,....

@SetFuego that sounds like a very slow *****, and also that really has not achieved anything more but small tweaks to the gaming system and not a total collapse.

@Orclover, @SetFuego good valid points so what's the next step... how does one change the mindset of the masses?

Not at all @Ironman79, not necessary and not possible. Just keep appealing to the conscience of the exploiters of weaknesses by repeatedly pointing out the *****.

@Orclover, @SetFuego good valid points so what's the next step... how does one change the mindset of the masses?

@Z22

The first Hue one is my favorite. Thank you very much. Reminds of the older glass scene you did I like so well.👍

...and this is prime example of master *****. Oh well, if the manipulated are happy, whose to judge.

Always the one who takes advantage of someone else's weaknesses.

@Z22

I can edit the sizes myself. So you don't have to plaster a page of the forum...lol

Edit Again: The fire hue works too.

Hue Fire V3 1080p

clip {
id: Clip
deny: top
//deny: top, table, cage, pole, inout
}


texture
{
id: Feedback
size: 1920, 1080
source: empty/
}

texture
{
id: Flame
source: Textures/
}

texture
{
id: BG
size: 1920, 1080
source: Background/
}
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

framebuffer
{
id: FeedbackBuffer
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
source: Feedback
}
}

// First frame of the FeedbackBuffer is white so need to clear it.
framebuffer
{
id: ClearFB
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
source: FeedbackBuffer
shader: ClearFB.fsh
}
}
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

framebuffer
{
id: Girl
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

clipSprite
{
pos: 0, 535 //yes... 535 is correct, it stops a problem with the bottom of the screen in hue
source: Clip
scale: -1.0, 1.0
standingHeight: 850
sittingHeight: 652
}
}

// Create a normal of the girl and add it to the FeedbackBuffer's red and green channels
framebuffer
{
id: Normal
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
source: Girl, 0
source: ClearFB, 1
shader: GetNormal_turb.fsh
}
}

// Create a blur of the girls alpha channel with a shift down so it looks like its moving up and add it to the FeedbackBuffer's blue channel.
framebuffer
{
id: Hue
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
source: Girl, 0
source: Normal, 1
shader: Hue_F3.fsh
uniform: speed, float, 0.008 // rate of change (fade)
uniform: resdiv, float, 1.0 //size of sample area
}
}

// Take the values from the FeedbackBuffer and use them as offsets when reading from the "Flame" texture.
framebuffer
{
id: Fire
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
source: Hue, 0
source: Flame, 1
shader: Fire3.fsh
}
}


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

camera {

type: 2D
size: 1920, 1080
pos: 960, 540

sprite
{
pos: 0, 0
source: BG
}

sprite
{
pos: 0, 0
source: Fire
}

sprite
{
pos: 0, 0
source: Girl
}

// Last sprite will be the input to the Feedbackbuffer next frame.

sprite
{
opacity: 0.0 // If only using for feedback you can set to 0.0.
source: Hue
}

}

I have just seen the details of Melody Clark's first release (isWorkshop) and I am excited.

An XXX card - she looks smoking hot especially with that hair cut and the sweetly trimmed pussy.

It can't be released soon enough.❤️😛😍

That's up to you @Z22 The last 3 Hue ones were kind of cool if you want to do that your call.

@DANO70 If there are any you want in 1080p let me know as they should work better on your machine. I will post the adjusted code in here for you to copy.

@TheEmu

From what E.T. said in his posts @Z22 's were not working for him in any version includeing ours.

@Z22

Your's have all worked for me lately. Just a bit sluggish that's all.

Yeh, mine do have a tendancy not to work on other peoples machines :/


The reason why i include

version 120

is because atom, which i use for editing, throws up an error if it's not present. I usually forget to remove it.

@DANO70

I am pretty sure that @EverthangForever was saying that the scenes all worked with the stable released version of iStripper (the one you and myself are using), that neither FractalGarden074 nor @Z22 's Hue scenes worked with the previous beta version and that FractalGarden074 but not @Z22 's scenes worked with the newest beta.

This is consistant with the betas using a newer version of the Qt toolkit, that that toolkit or the way in which iStripper uses it effectively changed the default behaviour for the version directive allowing FractalGarden074 to be fixed by doing the equivalent of automatically inserting a a version directive but that Z22's scenes are relying on some other, possibly undefined, behaviour, which has changed with the new Qt library. If this is so then there may be nothing that Totem can do to get Z22's shaders to work again - which would be a great loss.

What they may be able to do is to provide a way to indicate in the .scn fle that a shader takes one of its sources the output generated by itself (or some other shader) in the previous frame. This is what Z22's shaders (when I looked at them a long time ago) seemed to be doing "by accident" rather than via some explicit construct used in the .scn file.

@E.T.

Just to clarify @Z22 's Hue 1-2-3 scenes DO render/work for me. Just a tad studdery. Which is fairly normal most times in my case.

Your FractalGarden074 is the ones that doesn't display the effect on the girl and the log errors comes in.

It's usualy the otherway around with @Z22 's giving errors and such. But his have been fine mostly. That's what shocked me yours not to work .😀

@EverthangForever

I have never been able to understand why some of Z22's shaders work. I am not at all sure that they do not rely on some undefined behaviour of the graphics pipeline (i.e. they may be relying on a bug), in particular with how various buffers between stages are initialised or re-allocated. If so this is pity because the feedback from shader output to shader input that these shaders rely on can be used for some very interresting effects (as Z22's shaders show).

Thanks @theEmu and thanks @Dano for your specs. & comments. I did not realise you were not using a higher type of graphics adapter than what you have. I doubt iStripper beta 1.2.260 as it is, will solve your problem with FractalGarden074 which uses glass4.fsh etc.

@TheEmu

The version directive says that the shader will use some of these "newer" features and if they are not available then the shader will not compile. From a recent posting by one of the developers it seems that the latest iStripper beta will automatically enable these features.

I upgraded to beta 1.2.260 and although I am now able to run @Number6"s shader sample scene ok, it appears to be a specific fix. I am still having no joy with any of the above Z22_Hue* shaders.

looks like we just have to wait and see if the Team will modify their fullscreen compatibility some more.
When I post Z22_Hue* & FG074 archive links up into the Share List thread, I will warn that there might be limited functionality with these. Thanks a lot ;-)

@TheEmu

so they would have been in danger of buying them again !

Astute observation!

@DrDoom9

1. Activate the Card again through the Eyeball Symbol.
2. Delete the Card (click on the Garbage can), so that you are no longer be able to play her Show.
3. Access the following Directory, where you can find the Card/Model Information.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/37892/3#post653424
4. Delete! not move in your Garbage can! all the Content in this Folder.
5. Go one Step back, right click on that specific Folder f0644 in this case.
6. Right Click on the Folder and, set the Folder to READ ONLY!

https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/windows-server-cookbook/0596006330/ch04s14.html
or use the Command Line in Windows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QralfKAFr0

7. Restart! iStripper
8. You should now have an empty Card in your Collection (see my example on the Screenshot)
9. Hide the Card again through the Eyeball Symbol!

The Read only Option avoids that the Card appears again after an Update or Synchronize with the Server.
Hope this Helps.

Yeah I read that in the beta threads earlier @Number6 discussed. I just posted it for @E.T. 's benefit.

@DrDoom9

but it seems rather perverse to deny one's history to oneself.

That is what I thought as well - but a few people insisted that just disabling and deleting the cards was not enough and that they wanted no references to them in their collections. What they often asked for (the ability to return cards they didn't like) would have resulted in the cards reappearing in their girl's store, preview pushes and in special offers with random card selections - so they would have been in danger of buying them again !

Well it finally cost me 120 credits ... after winning 580 and spending 700. Anastasiia is definitely worth it but iStripper is becoming a very expensive site. 😕
It's worth ten times a normal card? For real? 😲

I live in a state where the highest paid public employee makes 5 million a year and is a FOOTBALL COACH...this same state has been cutting education spending and social services for 25 years. Humans are certainly not logical when it comes to spending their resources, the only thing that makes me disappointed is we know humans aren't logical but we do know how to ***** them...and this is prime example of master *****. Oh well, if the manipulated are happy, whose to judge.

@DANO70

Yes, that will be down to not having a version directive, By default GLSL assumes that a shader does not use some "newer" features of the language. Though the features used in this shader have been part of GLSL at least as long as I have been using them in VGHD/iStripper scenes so they are not exactly new. Unfortunately the default behaviour of at least some G:SL compilers is to assume that a very old compiler is wanted even though the actual compiler is much more capable than that.

The version directive says that the shader will use some of these "newer" features and if they are not available then the shader will not compile. From a recent posting by one of the developers it seems that the latest iStripper beta will automatically enable these features.

The version directive is not present in many or most of the originals of the shaders that I obtained from shadertoy.com. In passing, in the past I did experiment with adding a version directive but doing so quite often caused problems in the form of false warnings flooding the vghd log without affecting the behaviour of the shader.

I suspect the reverse, that the laws allowing lotteries in the US included this as a requirement.

If the laws allowing lotteries had not included such a provision do you think that the lotteries would have chosen to do so ? I very much doubt it.

@E.T.

I don't mess with the real complex shaders scenes much anymore. They are too much for my semi ''potato'' most of the time as you know or ones with shader effects applied to the model herself doesn't work as you guys say (normal model displays). And alot of times the entire shader info fills the VG log. So I just leave them alone now, they're just not worth the trouble for me to tinker with sorry.

Example pics: likely the shader version number thing again with a few other errors the log says. Please don't ask for more info/testing than this. Like I say I don't want to mess with them. The pics are from your 2 last FractualGarden074 scenes recently.

anything new on the VR front we can expect?

Karissa & Debora A

@gkar45
I have taken a screenshot of it before and after clicking on the icon.

@TheEmu
Thanks. There are one or two cards I wish I had not bought, but I just deactivate them. One could delete them, but it seems rather perverse to deny one's history to oneself.